GST

CBIC waives late fee for filing GSTR-1, GSTR-6 for month of July 2019 if filed till 20.09.2019

CBIC waives late fee for filing GSTR-1, GSTR-6 for month of July 2019 if filed till 20.09.2019

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Subsection (i)]

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

Notification No. 41/2019 – Central Tax

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2019

G.S.R. (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby waives the amount of late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act, by the following class of taxpayers: –

(i) the registered persons whose principal place of business is in the district mentioned in column (3) of the Table below, of the State as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table, having aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year, who have furnished, electronically through the common portal, details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, for the month of July, 2019, on or before the 20th September, 2019;

(ii) the registered persons whose principal place of business is in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, having aggregate turnover of more than 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year, who have furnished, electronically through the common portal, details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, for the month of July, 2019, on or before the 20th September, 2019;

(iii) the Input Service Distributors whose principal place of business is in the district mentioned in column (3) of the above said Table, of the State as mentioned in column (2) of the said Table, who have furnished, electronically through the common portal, return in FORM GSTR-6 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, for the month of July, 2019, on or before the 20th September, 2019;

(iv) the Input Service Distributors whose principal place of business is in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, who have furnished, electronically through the common portal, return in FORM GSTR-6 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, for the month of July, 2019, on or before the 20th September, 2019.

Table

Sl. No Name of State Name of District
(1) (2) (3)
1. Bihar Araria, Kishanganj, Madhubani, East Champaran, Sitamarhi, Sheohar, Supaul, Darbhanga, Muzaffarpur, Saharsa, Katihar, Purnia, West Champaran
2. Gujarat Vadodara
3. Karnataka Bagalkot, Ballari, Belagavi, Chamarajanagar, Chikkamagalur, Dakshina Kannada, Davanagere, Dharwad, Gadag, Hassan, Haveri,
Kalaburagi, Kodagu, Koppal, Mandya, Mysuru, Raichur, Shivamogga, Udupi, Uttara Kannada, Vijayapura, Yadgir
4. Kerala Idukki, Malappuram, Wayanad, Kozhikode
5. Maharashtra Kolhapur, Sangli, Satara, Ratnagiri, Sindhudurg, Palghar, Nashik,
Ahmednagar.
6. Odisha Balangir, Sonepur, Kalahandi, Nuapada, Koraput, Malkangiri, Rayagada, Nawarangpur
7. Uttarakhand Uttarkashi and Chamoli

[F. No. 20/06/07/2019-GST]

(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago