GST

CGST composition scheme turnover limit for Levy @ 1, 2, or 3 %

CGST composition scheme turnover limit. Levy @ 1 2 or 3 % if turnover in preceding financial year did not exceed seventy five lakh rupee 

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No. 8/2017-Central Tax

New Delhi, the 27th June, 2017

G.S.R. 647(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred under the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby prescribes that an eligible registered person, whose aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed seventy five lakh rupees, may opt to pay, in lieu of the central tax payable by him, an amount calculated at the rate of,–

(i) one per cent. of the turnover in State in case of a manufacturer,
(ii) two and a half per cent. of the turnover in State in case of persons engaged in making supplies referred to in clause (b) of paragraph 6 of Schedule II of the said Act, and
(iii) half per cent. of the turnover in State in case of other suppliers: 

Provided that the aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year shall be fifty lakh rupees in the case of an eligible registered person, registered under section 25 of the said Act, in any following States, namely:—

(i) Arunachal Pradesh,
(ii) Assam,
(iii) Manipur,
(iv) Meghalaya,
(v) Mizoram,
(vi) Nagaland,
(vii) Sikkim,
(viii) Tripura,
(ix) Himachal Pradesh:

Provided further that the registered person shall not be eligible to opt for composition levy under subsection (1) of section 10 of the said Act if such person is a manufacturer of the goods, the description of which is specified in column (3) of the Table below and falling under the tariff item, sub-heading, heading or Chapter, as the case may be, as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Table:-

TABLE

S. No Tariff item, subheading, heading or Chapter Description
(1) (2) (3)
1. 2105 00 00 Ice cream and other edible ice, whether or not containing cocoa.
2. 2106 90 20 Pan masala
3. 24 All goods, i.e. Tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes

Explanation.—

(1) In this Table, “tariff item”, “sub-heading”, “heading” and “chapter” shall mean respectively a tariff item, sub-heading, heading and chapter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).

(2) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretation of this notification.

[F. No. 354/117/2017-TRU]
MOHIT TEWARI, Under Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

17 hours ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

19 hours ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

2 days ago
  • contract-law

UP Govt. notifies reduced rate of registration/stamp duty fees on lease agreements

Uttar Pradesh Government has notified reduced / concessional rate of registration and stamp duty fees on lease / rent agreements.…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

First-time experience in filing appeal a reasonable & bona fide cause for delay

First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…

4 days ago