GST

Extension of date of blocking e-way bill facility under Rule 138E to 21.08.2019. Read Notification

Extension of the date of blocking and unblocking e-way bill facility as per Rule 138E of CGST Rules, 2017 to 21.08.2019 as per decision taken in GST Council 35th Meeting 

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

Notification No. 25 /2019 – Central Tax

New Delhi, the 21st June, 2019

G.S.R. ….(E)— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, and on being satisfied
that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No. 22/2019- Central Tax, dated the 23rd April, 2019, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 323(E), dated the 23rd April, 2019, namely:-

In the said notification, for the figures, letters and words “21st day of June, 2019” the figures, letters and word “21st day of August, 2019” shall be substituted.

[F. No. 20/06/16/2018-GST (Pt. II)]

(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Note: -The principal notification No.22/2019- Central Tax, dated the 23rd April, 2019 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 323(E), dated the 23rd April, 2019.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago