Extension of time period for filing of FORM GSTR-3 July Aug 2017 to 15th September 2017 and 30th September, 2017 respectively
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
(Central Board of Excise and Customs)
New Delhi, 08th August, 2017
G.S.R. …..(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (6) of section 39 read with section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby extends the time limit for furnishing the return under sub-section (1) of section 39 of the said Act for the month as specified in column (2) of the Table below, within the period as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table, namely:-
TABLE
Serial Number | Month | Time period for filing of details in FORM GSTR-3 |
(1) | (2) | (3) |
1. | July 2017 | 11th to 15th September, 2017 |
2. | August 2017 | 26th to 30th September, 2017 |
2. This notification shall come into force with effect from the 8th day of August, 2017.
[F. No.349 /74 /2017-GST(Pt.)]
(Dr. Sreeparvathy S.L.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Note:
Simultaneously, extension have been made in the due date for filing other GST Forms. A summary of the extension made is as under:
Month | GSTR-1 | GSTR-2 | GSTR-3 | GSTR-3B |
July 2017 | 1 Sept to 5 Sept 2017 | 6 Sept to 10 Sept 2017 | 11Sep to 15 Sep 2017 | 20 Aug 2017 |
Aug 2017 | 16 Sept to 20 Sept 2017 | 21 Sept to 25 Sept 2017 | 26 Sep to 30 Sep 2017 | 20 Sep 2017 |
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…