Extension of the time limit for furnishing GST TDS return FORM GSTR-7 u/s 51 of the CGST Act 2017 for the months of October, 2018 to December, 2018 till 28.02.2019
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
[Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs]
New Delhi, the 31st January, 2019
G.S.R. (E):- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of section 39 read with section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Commissioner hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No. 66/2018-Central Tax, dated the 29th November, 2018, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1150(E), dated the 29th November, 2018, namely:-
In the said notification, for the words, figures and letters “the 31st day of January, 2019”, the words, figures and letters “the 28th day of February, 2019” shall be substituted.
[F. No. 20/06/17/2018-GST]
(Dr. Sreeparvathy S.L.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Note: – The principal notification No. 66/2018-Central Tax, dated the 29th November, 2018 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1150(E), dated the 29th November, 2018.
Absence of an explicit irrevocability clause in trust deed no ground for rejecting application for registration or renewal under section…
ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…
PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…
Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…
When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…
Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…