GST

Clarifications regarding applicability of GST on certain services. CBIC Circular

GST on accommodation services supplied by Air Force Mess to its personnel & incentive paid by MeitY to acquiring banks for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low value BHIM-UPI transactions.

CBIC has issued Circular No. 190/02/2023-GST dated 13th January, 2023 clarifying applicability of GST on following two issues  which were examined by GST Council in the 48th meeting held on 17th December, 2022.

The issue -wise clarifications given is as under:

1. Applicability of GST on accommodation services supplied by Air Force Mess to its personnel:

All services supplied by Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or local authority to any person other than business entities (barring a few specified services such as services of postal department, transportation of goods and passengers etc.) are exempt from GST vide Sl. No. 6 of notification No. 12/2017 –Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Therefore, as recommended by the GST Council, it is hereby clarified that accommodation services provided by Air Force Mess and other similar messes, such as, Army mess, Navy mess, Paramilitary and Police forces mess to their personnel or any person other than a business entity are covered bySl. No. 6 of notification No. 12/2017 –Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 provided the services supplied by such messes qualify to be considered as services supplied by Central Government, State Government, Union Territory or local authority.
 

2. Applicability of GST on incentive paid by MeitY to acquiring banks under Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low value BHIM-UPI transactions:

Under the Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low value BHIM-UPI transactions, the Government pays the acquiring banks an incentive as a percentage of value of RuPay Debit card transactions and low value BHIM-UPI transactions up to Rs.2000/-.

The Payments and Settlements Systems Act, 2007 prohibits banks and system providers from charging any amount from a person making or receiving a payment through RuPay Debit cards or BHIM-UPI.

The service supplied by the acquiring banks in the digital payment system in case of transactions through RuPay/BHIM UPI is the same as the service that they provide in case of transactions through any other card or mode of digital payment. The only difference is that the consideration for such services, instead of being paid by the merchant or the user of the card, is paid by the central government in the form of incentive. However, it is not a consideration paid by the central government for anyservice supplied by the acquiring bank to the Central Government. The incentive is in the nature of a subsidy directly linked to the price of the service and the same does not form part of the taxable value of the transaction in view of the provisions of section 2(31) and section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017.

It is clarified that incentives paid by MeitY to acquiring banks under the Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low value BHIM-UPI transactions are in the nature of subsidy and thus not taxable.

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm

NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, (NERIST)…

1 day ago
  • Empanelment

Sibsagar University invites EoI for Appointment of Internal Auditor for 01.08.2024 to 31.03.2026.

Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) for Appointment of Internal Auditor  Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) from reputed…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional

In a recent judgment Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional.…

1 day ago
  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

2 days ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

3 days ago