GST

Ignore prompt on liability for inward supplies attracting reverse charge in Table-3.1 (d) – GSTN

Ignore prompt on liability for inward supplies attracting reverse charge in Table-3.1 (d) – GSTN Advisory

GSTN has issued an advisory stating that taxpayers should ignore prompt on liability for inward supplies attracting reverse charge in Table-3.1 (d)

Ignore prompt on liability for inward supplies attracting reverse charge in Table-3.1 (d)

The system has started providing auto-populated GSTR-3B on the basis of GSTR-1 & GSTR-2B from the tax period of November 2020 onwards. In this auto-populated GSTR-3B, liability on account of inward supplies attracting reverse charge auto-populated in Table-3.1(d) is also drawn from GSTR-2B of the taxpayer for the said tax period. The values in GSTR 2B are auto populated from the GSTR-1 of the counter-parties making the supply.

GSTN has noticed that the system is giving alert when the taxpayer revises the auto-populated values upward by 10% in table 3.1(d) which pertains to inward supplies attracting reverse charge. This alert is erroneous. The technical team is working to resolve the same at the earliest.

However, as per the advisory, taxpayers may continue to declare their correct liability in Table-3.1(d) pertaining to liability on inward supplies attracting reverse charge and proceed to file GSTR-3B.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago