CBIC clarifies Myths and Facts on strict amendments in GST Laws to prevent frauds 

CBIC clarifies Myths and Facts on strict amendments in GST Laws to prevent frauds 

According to CBIC, the notification dated 23.12.2020 has been issued in order to curb the GST fake invoice frauds the Government on the recommendations of the GST Council’s Law Committee. The amendments aim to control the menace of fraudsters who avail and pass on ineligible ITC by fake or fly-by night firms.

So far, CBIC has booked about 12000 cases of ITC fraud and arrested 365 persons in such cases .  During the last six weeks alone, more than 165  fraudsters  have been arrested.

CBIC observed that there have been some misinformation on the recent  changes  on the Social Media causing  confusion among the genuine taxpayers.

CBIC  has clarified the following misinformation with facts:

Myth 1 : No Opportunity of being heard will be given if proper officer believes that registration is liable to be cancelled.

Fact: The GST laws passed by the Parliament and state Legislatures provide that GST registration is liable to be cancelled for those who have not filed 6 or more returns. It is therefore wrong to say that the cancellation will be done without reasons. To protect the interest of revenue, this provision has been put in the law so that fraudsters do not nm way with GST collected  from their customers.

It may be further noted that no cancellation of registration would be done without giving proper opportunity of hearing to the taxpayer. Immediate action for suspension is necessary in cases where unscrupulous operators seek to pass on  huge fake credit by gaming the system. Such act ion will not affect genuine taxpayers and will provide them a level playing field. Moreover, suspension may be revoked by the officer based on the taxpayer’s representation .

Myth 2: Even if there is a clerical error in filing  returns, GSTIN will be cancelled. No option to correct your mistakes.

Facts:  This is absolutely not true. Only in fraudulent cases where there are significant discrepencies based on data analytics and sound risk parameters, and not mere clerical errors, the action of suspension and cancellation will be taken up. An example of a fraudulent case and serious discrepency is where one has passed on Crores of Rupees of Input Tax Credit and not filed  GSTR 3B returns. nor has he filed Income Tax returns or  disclosed very little liability in Income Tax returns etc., The GST ecosystem is very carefully working towards curbing the fake invoice frauds in the interest of bonafide taxpayers. GST system applies sophisticated tools like BIFA, data analytics and AI & ML to pinpoint and segregate these fraudsters only.

Myth 3: The proposed change will impact ease of doing business.

Facts: Not True. Fraudsters are misusing the system to the detriment of the interest of gamine taxpayers. Consequently, data driven targeting of the fraudsters is the need of the hour. The data is being collected from Income Tax, Banks, Customs and necessary abcaus.in matching is being done to identify fraudsters and take action of suspension and cancellation after following due process of law. Precise targeting of fraudsters is being done only in specific cases, after doing a comprehensive analysis, using advanced data analytics tools. etc. Further, multiple risk indicators are checked and only then few high risk entities are selected. Action against fraudsters will not impact the Ease of Doing Business which is achieved in GST through liberal registration, refund regime and self-compliance system with little or no manual checks.

• AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT
• Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC
• Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation
• ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination
• Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A