Officer for provisions relating to Registration and Composition levy under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rules
Circular No.1/1/2017
F. No. 349/75/2017-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi, Dated the 26th June, 2017
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioners/ Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Central Tax (All) / Director General of Systems
Madam/Sir,
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (91) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act (13 of 2017) and subject to sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said Act, the Board, hereby assigns the officers mentioned in Column (2) of the Table below, the functions as the proper officers in relation to the various sections of the of the said Act or the rules made thereunder mentioned in the corresponding entry in Column (3) of the said Table:-
Table
| Serial Number | Designation of the Officer | Functions under Section of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder |
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
| 1 | Assistant or Deputy Commissioners of Central Tax and Assistant or Deputy Directors of Central Tax | i. Sub-Section (5) of Section 10 ii. Proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 27 iii. Section 30 iv. Rule 6 v. Rule 23 vi. Rule 25 |
| 2. | Superintendent of Central Tax | i. Sub-section (8) of Section 25 ii. Section 28 iii. Section 29 iv. Rule 9 v. Rule 10 vi. Rule 12 vii. Rule 16 viii. Rule 17 ix. Rule 19 x. Rule 22 xi. Rule 24 |
2. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this circular.
3. Difficulty, if any, in the implementation of the above instructions may please be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
-sd-
(Upender Gupta) Commissioner (GST)
Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…
High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…
Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…
Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…
Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…
Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…