GST

Payment of GST by Fixed Sum Method under QRMP Scheme

Payment of GST by Fixed Sum Method under QRMP Scheme

W.e.f. 1st January, 2021, following two options are available to the Taxpayers who are under Quarterly Returns and Monthly Payment of Tax (QRMP) Scheme for tax payment for first 02 months of a quarter:

(a) Fixed Sum Method: Portal can generate a pre-filled challan in Form GST PMT-06 based on his past record.

(b) Self-Assessment Method: The Tax due is to be paid on actual supplies after deducting the Input Tax Credit available.

In fixed sum method, the 35% Challan can be generated by selecting the Reason For Challan>Monthly Payment for Quarterly Return> 35% Challan which is in turn calculated as per following situation:

(a) 35% of amount paid as tax from Electronic Cash Ledger in their preceding quarter GSTR 3B return, if it was furnished on quarterly basis; or

(b) 100% of the amount paid as tax from Electronic Cash Ledger in their GSTR-3B return for the last month of the immediately preceding quarter, if it was furnished on monthly basis.

It is to note that , for the months of Jan and Feb, 2021, in Q4 of 2020-21, the auto-populated challan generated under 35% Challan would contain 100% of the tax liability discharged from Electronic Cash Ledger for the month of December, 2020 (and not 35%). [Reason: Till December 2020, all taxpayers were filing GSTR-3B return on a monthly basis.]

From April, 2021 onwards, the pattern as suggested at Para 2 (a) and (b) would follow.

It is noteworthy, that the taxpayers are not required to deposit any amount for the first 02 months of a quarter, if:

(a) Balance in Electronic Cash Ledger / Electronic Credit Ledger is sufficient for tax due for the first/ second month of the quarter; or

(b) There is NIL tax liability

Share

Recent Posts

  • CA CS CMA

CA accused of forgery by advising investment in a firm gets bail by Allahabad High Court

Chartered Accountant accused of forgery and misappropriation of fund by advising investment in a particular firm gets bail  In a…

2 hours ago
  • consumer-protection

Software had nexus with generation of profits, purchaser can’t be said a consumer – SC

Purchase of software had a nexus with generation of profits, therefore purchaser was not a consumer under Consumer Protection Act…

5 hours ago
  • post office

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled money by mere stamping passbooks

Termination upheld of Postmaster who embezzled deposit money by mere stamping passbooks of account holders. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

6 hours ago
  • GST

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of two parallel GST proceedings

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of bar on two parallel GST proceedings in terms of Section 6(2)(b)…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee can’t be said to indulged in penny stock sale without showing his involvement

Assessee could not said to indulged in penny stock sale on human probabilities without showing his involvement – ITAT deleted…

12 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

Before staying CESTAT order High Court should have framed substantial questions of law – SC

Before staying CESTAT order the High Court should have framed the substantial questions of law and thereafter could have passed…

1 day ago