GST

Special procedure under Delhi GST Act for rectification of order for wrong ITC availment

Special procedure notified under Delhi GST Act 2017 for rectification of order confirming demand for wrong availment of ITC.

Lt. Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has notified Special procedure under Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for rectification of order confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit.

In exercise of the powers conferred under the section 148 of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the Act) the Lieutenant Governor of National Capital Territory of Delhi has notified the following special procedure for rectification of order against a registered person against whom an order u/s 73 or section 74 or section 107 or section 108 of the said Act has been issued confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit, on account of contravention of provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of the Act, but where such input tax credit is now available as per the provisions of subsection (5) or sub-section (6) of section 16 of the said Act, and where appeal against the said order has not been filed, namely:

1. The said person shall file, electronically on the common portal, within a period of six months from the date of issuance of this notification, an application for rectification of an order issued under section 73 or section 74 or section 107 or section 108 of the said Act, as the case may be, confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit, on account of contravention of provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of the said Act, but where such input tax credit is now available as per the provisions of sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) of section 16 of the said Act, and where appeal against the said order has not been filed.

2. The said person shall, along with the said application, upload the information in the proforma in Annexure A

3. The proper officer for carrying out rectification of the said order shall be the authority who had issued such order, and the said authority shall take a decision on the said application and issue the rectified order, as far as possible, within a period of three months from the date of the said application.

4. Where any rectification is required to be made in the order referred to in paragraph 1 and, the said authority has issued a rectified order thereof, then the said authority shall upload a summary of the rectified order electronically –

(i) in FORM GST DRC-08, in cases where rectification of an order issued under section 73 or section 74 of the said Act is made; and

(ii) in FORM GST APL-04, in cases where rectification of an order issued under section 107 or section 108 of the said Act is made.

5. The rectification is required to be made only in respect of demand of such input tax credit which has been alleged to be wrongly availed in contravention of provisions of sub-section (4) of section 16 of the said Act, but where such input tax credit is now available as per the provisions of sub-section (5) or subsection (6) of the said section 16.

6. Where such rectification adversely affects the said person, the principles of natural justice shall be followed by the authority carrying out such rectification.

Download Notification under Delhi GST Act Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

40 minutes ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

2 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

7 days ago