ICAI

CA Proprietary firm or individual practicing CA can be appointed company auditor only for one term – ICAI Clarification

CA Proprietary firm or individual practicing CA can be appointed company auditor u/s 139 only for one term – ICAI Clarification

ICAI has clarified that Proprietary firm (having FRN) or individual Chartered Accountant (CA) who is practicing either in his own name or trade name can be appointed as auditor only for one term as per Section 139 of Companies Act, 2013

The clarification is given on auditors appointment u/s 139 of Companies Act 2013 read with Rule 5 & 6 of the Companies (Audit & Auditors) Rules 2014

The Announcement was made by the Corporate Laws & Corporate Governance Committee today in the form of a question and answer as under:

Question: Whether a Proprietary firm (having FRN) or individual CA who is practicing either in his own name or trade name can be appointed for two terms as per Section 139 of Companies Act, 2013? 

Answer: 

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that subject to the provisions of this Chapter, every company shall, at the first annual general meeting, appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till the conclusion of every sixth meeting and the manner and procedure of selection of auditors by the members of the company at such meeting shall be such as may be prescribed:

No listed company or a company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or re-appoint—

(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years; and

(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years:

As per Rule 5 and 6 of Companies (Audit and Auditor) Rules, 2014, the Class of Companies who are required to comply with the provisions of Section 139 are as follows:

For the purposes of sub-section (2) of section 139, the class of companies shall mean the following classes of companies excluding one person companies and small companies:-

(a) all unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of rupees ten crore or more;
(b) all private limited companies having paid up share capital of rupees fifty crore or more;
(c) all companies having paid up share capital of below threshold limit mentioned in (a) and (b) above, but having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of rupees fifty crores or more.

Manner of rotation of auditors by the companies on expiry of their term.-As per ExplanationI to Rule 6 of Companies (Audit and Auditor) Rules, 2014,the term “same network” includes the firms operating or functioning, hitherto or in future, under the same brand name, trade name or common control.

Further, as per the said Rules, Individual auditor shall include other individuals or firms whose name or trade mark or brand is used by such individual, if any.

Accordingly, it is stated that a Proprietary firm (having FRN) or individual CA who is practicing either in his own name or trade name can be appointed as auditor only for one term as per Section 139 of Companies Act, 2013.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago