Excel for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
CORAM:
ORDER Petitioner-institute challenges the order dated 28th February, 2014 as well as the letter dated 30th April, 2014 and notice dated 17th April, 2014 as being contrary to the Competition Act, 2002 and the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Mr. A.N. Haksar, learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner-institute cannot be subject to jurisdiction of respondent No.1 under the Competition Act when it is discharging its regulatory and statutory functions under the Chartered Accountants Act. He further submits that the impugned order, notice and letter are contrary to the Division Bench judgment of this Court in The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Anr. vs. The Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions), Delhi and Others being W.P.(C) 3147/2012 wherein it has been held that petitioner-institute does not carry on any trade, business or commerce.
Mr. Haksar, learned senior counsel for petitioner further submits that respondent No.1 failed to appreciate that petitioner-institute is merely ensuring maintenance of high standards of professionalism of its members through a continuing educational programme.
Mr. Balbir Singh, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 3 and 4. He prays for and is granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit. Issue notice to respondent No.2 by way of speed post.
List the matter before Registrar for completion of service and pleadings on 25th July, 2014. Registrar is directed to list the matter before Court after service and pleadings have been completed. Order dasti.
MANMOHAN, J
Related Update:
|