ICAI issues 226 FAQs on The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance 2019. CAs not to act in violation of Sections 3, 4 5 and 6 of the Ordinance.
The ‘Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance 2019’ was necessitated by the difficulties faced in investigating of ponzi-schemes. The said ordinance has been promulgated to completely ban unregulated deposit schemes, it prohibit solicitation or acceptance of deposits outside the Regulated Deposit Scheme.
The Ordinance provides for a effective mechanism to absolutely ban unregulated deposit schemes to protect the interests of depositors and provides for stiff penalties for the offences involving wrongful inducement, solicitation or acceptance of deposits under an unregulated deposit schemes as well as fraudulent default in repayment or return under a Regulated Deposit Scheme.
The Committee on Economic, Commercial Laws & Economic Advisory of ICAI has brought out ‘FAQs on the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance, 2019’ help the Chartered Accountants in rendering services to stake holders in the relevant fields.
As per the FAQ, currently no specific role has been prescribed for Chartered
Accountants under this Ordinance. However, a chartered accountant, after understanding the law, can advise or inform his clients / management on compliance required under Section 10 of the Ordinance. The CAs should not act in violation of Sections 3, 4 5 and 6 of the Ordinance.
The FAQs contain 226 questions and their answers in easy to understand language which is even helpful to general public in understanding the various provisions of the Ordinance.
The FAQ answers many apprehensions like whether amounts received from relatives or customer advances are deposits? what are the exclusions for different business entities? if Trusts/Cooperatives/ Societies covered under the Ordinance? What is Regulated Deposit Scheme? etc.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…