ICAI

ICAI bans two chartered accountants on charges of professional misconduct

The Disciplinary Committee of ICAI has banned two chartered accountants of Delhi on charges of professional misconduct.

In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee of ICAI has banned two chartered accountants.

Name and Address Offence Punishment
CA. Praveen Murarka (Membership No. 513907), Office No 102, 82-83, Main Vikas Marg, Above Titan Eye Showroom, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi 110092 Bringing disrepute to the profession or the Institute as a result of his action whether or not related to his professional work and for not exercising due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties Name removed from the Register of Members for a consolidated period of 09 months with effect from 17th April, 2025
CA. Subhash Chander Sharma (Membership No. 083982), 304, Delhi Chamber, 3453, Delhi Gate, New Delhi 110002 Item (7) of Part I of Second Schedule and Item (2) of Part IV of First Schedule Name removed from the Register of Members for a period of one month

Download ICAI Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

10 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

19 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago