ICAI

Appellate Authority reduced name removal period of CA found guilty of misconduct considering age & fine

Appellate Authority reduced the period of name removal by one year of CA found guilty of misconduct considering age and fine

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2909 (2019) (05) AA

Disciplinary Committee of ICAI, in terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, had held CA. Purushottam Shivdas Sakhalkar (Membership No. 035808), 4C, Jape Chawl, RR Thakur Road, Jogeshwari –E, Mumbai as guilty of Professional Misconduct falling within the meaning of Clauses (5),(6), (7) & (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the said Act.

Consequently, the name of CA Purushottam Shivdas Sakhalkar was removed from the Register of Members for a period of two years with effect from 7th September, 2018. and was also imposed with a penalty of Rs. 50,000/-.

This entire case was based upon statement made by the appellant before SFIO  wherein he had admitted, having not factually audited the books of account of the company of which he was an Auditor but merely signed the papers.

Aggrieved by the order, the said CA (the appellant) filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority.

The  appellant made a statement that he was not disputing the facts of the case and admitted his guilt, but only prayed that the sentence awarded to him be reduced, keeping into consideration that he had already paid fine of Rs. 50,000/- and suffered his name removal from the register of members for a period of seven and half months out of two years punishment as awarded by the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute. 

The Appellate Authority considering the age of the appellant and in the interest of justice opined that it will be appropriate to reduce the punishment of removal of the name of the appellant to the extent for a period of one year from the date of Gazette Notification and payment of Rs. 50,000/- which stood already paid.

The Appellate Authority accordingly modified the sentence awarded to the appellant and directed the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to restore the name of the appellant in the register of members after completion of one year from the date of his initial removal on the appellant making an application before the Institute requesting the restoration of his name in the register of members.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Amendments proposed in TDS and related provisions by Budget 2026-27

Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…

12 hours ago
  • Custom

Baggage Rules 2026 rationalised, other newly introduced Custom reforms

Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…

22 hours ago