ICAI

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board related to chartered accountants/firm in practice.

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board related to chartered accountants/firm in practice. Mentioning Knowledge Partner not permissible.

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board

1. A chartered accountants in practice cannot become Financial Advisors and receive fees/commission from Financial Institutions such as Mutual Funds, Insurance Companies, NBFCs etc.
2. A chartered accountant cannot exercise lien over the client documents/records for non-payment of his fees.
3. It is not permissible for CA Firm to print its vision and values behind the visiting cards, it would result in solicitation and therefore would be violative of the provisions of Clause (6) of Part-I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
4. It is not permissible for chartered accountants in practice to take agencies of UTI, GIC or NSDL.
5. It is permissible for a member in practice to be a settler of a trust.
6. A member in practice cannot hold Customs Brokers Licence under section 146 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 in terms of the provisions of Code of Ethics.
7. A Chartered accountant in service may appear as tax representative before tax authorities on behalf of his employer, but not on behalf of other employees of the employer.
8. A chartered accountant who is the statutory auditor of a bank cannot for the same financial year accept stock audit of the same branch of the bank or any of the branches of the same bank or sister concern of the bank, for the same financial year.
9. A CA Firm which has been appointed as the internal auditor of a PF Trust by a Government Company cannot be appointed as its Statutory Auditor.
10. A concurrent auditor of a bank ‘X’ cannot be appointed as statutory auditor of bank ‘Y’, which is sponsored by ‘X’.
11. A CA/CA Firm can act as the internal auditor of a company & statutory auditor of its employees PF Fund under the new Companies Act (2013).
12 The Ethical Standards Board while noting that there is requirement for a Director u/s 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to reside in India for a minimum period of 182 days in the previous calendar year, decided that such a Director would be within the scope of Director Simplicitor (which is generally permitted as per ICAI norms) , if he is non –executive director, required in the Board Meetings only , and not paid any remuneration except for attending such Board Meetings.
13. Illustrative Formats of acceptance letters to be submitted by the incoming auditor u/s 139(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the formats are illustrative only and not mandatory)
14. Mentioning the firm as a “Knowledge Partner” or in the “Thank You” advertisement, is not permissible, however mention of name of an individual member with prefix/suffix “CA” as a “knowledge partner “ is permissible.
15. Permitting the use of firm name by client, mentioning the firm as a “Knowledge Partner” or in the “Thank You” advertisement, is not permissible.
16. Concurrent auditor of an entity cannot accept an assignment done under any statue.
17. A chartered accountant in practice may establish a TIN – FC, and may as well establish a TIN – FC under franchise from the other entity which is already a TIN – FC.
18. Quick Response Code (QR Code) may be printed on the visiting Card by a member in practice, provided that the Code does not contain information that is not otherwise permissible to be printed on a visiting Card.
19. A statutory auditor and tax auditor can not be valuer of the unquoted equity shares as it would create threats to independence of the auditor, which may not possibly be reduced by application of safeguards.
20. The use of banner with name of CA firm is not permissible in terms of provisions of Items 6 and 7 of Part –I of First Schedule to The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

1 week ago