ICAI

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board related to chartered accountants/firm in practice.

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board related to chartered accountants/firm in practice. Mentioning Knowledge Partner not permissible.

Recent Decisions of ICAI Ethical Standards Board

1. A chartered accountants in practice cannot become Financial Advisors and receive fees/commission from Financial Institutions such as Mutual Funds, Insurance Companies, NBFCs etc.
2. A chartered accountant cannot exercise lien over the client documents/records for non-payment of his fees.
3. It is not permissible for CA Firm to print its vision and values behind the visiting cards, it would result in solicitation and therefore would be violative of the provisions of Clause (6) of Part-I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
4. It is not permissible for chartered accountants in practice to take agencies of UTI, GIC or NSDL.
5. It is permissible for a member in practice to be a settler of a trust.
6. A member in practice cannot hold Customs Brokers Licence under section 146 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 in terms of the provisions of Code of Ethics.
7. A Chartered accountant in service may appear as tax representative before tax authorities on behalf of his employer, but not on behalf of other employees of the employer.
8. A chartered accountant who is the statutory auditor of a bank cannot for the same financial year accept stock audit of the same branch of the bank or any of the branches of the same bank or sister concern of the bank, for the same financial year.
9. A CA Firm which has been appointed as the internal auditor of a PF Trust by a Government Company cannot be appointed as its Statutory Auditor.
10. A concurrent auditor of a bank ‘X’ cannot be appointed as statutory auditor of bank ‘Y’, which is sponsored by ‘X’.
11. A CA/CA Firm can act as the internal auditor of a company & statutory auditor of its employees PF Fund under the new Companies Act (2013).
12 The Ethical Standards Board while noting that there is requirement for a Director u/s 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to reside in India for a minimum period of 182 days in the previous calendar year, decided that such a Director would be within the scope of Director Simplicitor (which is generally permitted as per ICAI norms) , if he is non –executive director, required in the Board Meetings only , and not paid any remuneration except for attending such Board Meetings.
13. Illustrative Formats of acceptance letters to be submitted by the incoming auditor u/s 139(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the formats are illustrative only and not mandatory)
14. Mentioning the firm as a “Knowledge Partner” or in the “Thank You” advertisement, is not permissible, however mention of name of an individual member with prefix/suffix “CA” as a “knowledge partner “ is permissible.
15. Permitting the use of firm name by client, mentioning the firm as a “Knowledge Partner” or in the “Thank You” advertisement, is not permissible.
16. Concurrent auditor of an entity cannot accept an assignment done under any statue.
17. A chartered accountant in practice may establish a TIN – FC, and may as well establish a TIN – FC under franchise from the other entity which is already a TIN – FC.
18. Quick Response Code (QR Code) may be printed on the visiting Card by a member in practice, provided that the Code does not contain information that is not otherwise permissible to be printed on a visiting Card.
19. A statutory auditor and tax auditor can not be valuer of the unquoted equity shares as it would create threats to independence of the auditor, which may not possibly be reduced by application of safeguards.
20. The use of banner with name of CA firm is not permissible in terms of provisions of Items 6 and 7 of Part –I of First Schedule to The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

5 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

1 week ago