ICSI advisory on annual filing u/s 92 or 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 before 30th June, 2018
ICSI has issued an advisory to its members on filing of e-forms under section 92 or 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 before 30th June, 2018
Attention the company Secretaries members have been drawn to the notification of Companies (Registered Office and Fees) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs along with providing relaxation for the Additional Fees payable in the event of delay wherein the due date of filing of Forms falls prior to 30th June, 2018.
Attention has been drawn to the following illustrative table which depicts the additional fees applicable in different scenarios for the corporates pertaining to the annual filing of forms:
|
Particulars |
Additional Fees |
|
|
Du e date after 30th June, 2 018 |
Due date prior to 30th June, 2018 |
|
|
Forms MGT-7, AoC-4, AoC-4 XBRL and AoC -4 CFS u nder Section 92 (Annual Return) or 137 (Annual Financial Statement) of the Companies Act, 2013 |
Rs.100 per day |
Additional fee as per applicable slab for the period of delay up to 30th June, 2018 plus Additional fee @ Rs.100 per day with effect from 1st July, 2018 |
|
23AC, 23ACA, 23AC XBRL, 23ACA XBRL, 20B, 21A under Companies Act, 1956 |
Not Applicable |
Additional fee as per applicable slab for the period of delay up to 30th June, 2018 plus Additional fee@ Rs.100 per day with effect from 1st July, 2018 |
In view of the additional fee leviable in the event of default, members have been advised to avoid any last minute rush and levy of additional fees.
The ICSI has reiterated the ultimate goal of good governance is through better compliance and members should strive towards assisting companies in timely filing of forms.
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…