Income Tax

Application for Advance Pricing Agreement Form No 3CED Amendment, Particulars of the Associated Enterprises/Parent Companies

Application for Advance Pricing Agreement Form No 3CED Amendment, Particulars of the Associated Enterprises/Parent Companies

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 16th June, 2017

Notification No. 53 /2017

S.O. 1927(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (9) of section 92CC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:___

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (16th Amendment) Rules, 2017.
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in Appendix II, in Form No. 3CED, under sub-heading “General”,

(i) for item 3, following item shall be substituted, namely:

“3. Particular(s) of the Associated Enterprises with whom the APA is requested for:

a. Name(s) of the Associated Enterprise(s):
b. Name(s) of the country(ies) in which the associated enterprises mentioned in clause (a) are located:
c. Taxpayer Registration Number/ Taxpayer Identification Number/ Functional equivalent/ Any unique number used for identification of the Associated Enterprise by the Government of that country/specified territory in which the Associated Enterprise claims to be located:”;

(ii) for item 4, the following item shall be substituted, namely:-

“4. Particulars of the Parent Company(ies) of the applicant:

a. Name of Immediate parent company of applicant:
b. Address of Immediate parent company of applicant:
c. Country of residence of Immediate parent company of applicant:
d. Taxpayer Registration Number/ Taxpayer Identification Number/ Functional equivalent/Any unique number used for identification of the Immediate parent company by the Government of that country/specified territory of which it claims to be a resident:
e. Name of Ultimate parent company of applicant:
f. Address of Ultimate parent company of applicant
g. Country of residence of Ultimate parent company of applicant
h. Taxpayer Registration Number/ Taxpayer Identification Number/ Functional equivalent/ Any unique number used for identification of the Ultimate parent company by the Government of that country/specified territory of which it claims to be a resident:”;

[F. No. 370142/34/2016-TPL]

RAJESH KUMAR KEDIA,
Director (Tax Policy and Legislation)

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Subsection (ii) vide number S.O. 969 (E) dated the 26th March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number G.S.R. 590(E), dated the 15th June, 2017.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

8 hours ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago