Income Tax

Belated Form 10 for accumulation of income allowed as trust believed it applied 85% income

Belated Form 10 allowed as trust had reasonable belief it has applied 85% of income for charitable purposes and not required to file Form 10 for accumulation of income

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3729 (2023) (05) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) in holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) was correct in making addition u/s 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on account  of  shortfall in accumulation of income as the appellant failed to file the requisite Form 10 before the AO

The appellant assessee was a trust registered u/s 11 and 12 of the Act as a charitable institution engaged in running of an educational institution.

Since the assessee has failed to furnish the Form No. 10 in time, the Assessing Officer denied the benefit of accumulation of fund as provided u/s 11(2) of the Act and made the impugned addition.

The assessee submitted that the relevant assessment year was the first year for e-filing of Form No. 10 and that even the CBDT had taken note of the above fact that due to certain circumstances, some of the assessees could not file Form 10 in time and hence the CBDT directed Commissioners to condone the delay in filing Form 10 in cases in which assessees were prevented by reasonable cause of filing the Form 10 in time.

It was further submitted that Form No. 10 was duly filed before the Assessing Officer and was very much available to the Assessing Officer at the time of assessment proceedings.

The Tribunal observed that the assessment year in hand was the first year for which Form 10 was to be e-filed.

The Tribunal opined that since the assessee-trust  was having reasonable belief that the assessee-trust had applied 85% of its income for charitable purposes and, therefore, the assessee-trust was not required to file Form 10 for shortfall in application of income and claiming accumulation thereof and  since the assessee-trust had filed the Form 10 during the assessment proceedings,  the  Assessing Officer should consider the said Form 10 and grant relief to the assessee as per the relevant provisions, if the assessee is otherwise so found eligible.

Accordingly, the order of CIT(A) was set aside with direction to the Assessing Officer to grant relief to the assessee as admissible under the provisions of section 11 and 12 of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

3 days ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Flower bed area not included in “built up area” to calculate eligible limit u/s 80IB(10)

Flower bed area could not be included in the definition of “built up area” to calculate eligible limit of 1000…

6 days ago