Cash deposits by CA stated to be trading income added as unexplained income u/s 68 as ICAI does not allow CAs to do any business activity
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3574 (2022) (02) ITAT
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on account of cash deposit.
The assessee was a practicing CA being partner in a Chartered Accountant’s firm.
As per the AIR Information, the AO came to know that the assessee had deposited large amount of cash in his various savings bank accounts.
The assessee was asked to explain the source of cash deposited in the bank accounts. In his reply, the assessee accepted that the receipts belonged to him and simultaneously submitted a revised return showing the amount of cash deposits as income from trading business of Grey Fabrics.
The reasons for revising the return was mentioned as to buy peace and avoid litigation with the Income Tax Department in pursuance of AIR Information.
The AO dismissed the revised return as invalid ITR and did not accept the claim of business for want of evidences.
The deposits were treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act and the addition was made accordingly.
The Tribunal observed that since the assessee was a practicing Chartered Accountant, he was barred from doing any business in terms of professional code of conduct of the ICAI.
The assessee failed to produce permission of the governing body of the ICAI to allow him to said business of trading in fabrics.
Further, even before the Tribunal the assessee failed to brought on record any demonstrative evidence to justify his business activities. There was no evidence of any VAT, GST or permission from Municipality. Nor there was any evidence in respect of purchases/ sales of Gray Fabrics.
The Tribunal opined that the revised return was filed only to cover up the queries raised during the assessment proceedings in respect of cash found to be deposited in various bank accounts.
Accordingly, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…