Income Tax

CBDT designates ACIT (e-Verification) Delhi as prescribed Authority u/s 143(2) read with Rule 12E

CBDT designates ACIT (e-Verification) having headquarter at Delhi, to act as prescribed Income-tax Authority u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act read with Rule 12E

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 65/2019

New Delhi, the 13th September, 2019

(INCOME-TAX)

S.O. 3279(E).—In pursuance of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and (2) of section 120 and sub-section (2) of Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as said Act), read with rule 12E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby authorises that the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (e-Verification), having headquarter at Delhi, to act as prescribed Income-tax Authority for the purpose of sub-section (2) of section 143 of the said Act, in respect of returns furnished under section 139 or in response to a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142 of the said Act during the financial year commencing on 1st day of April, 2018 for the purposes of issuance of notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 of the said Act.

2. This notification shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

[F. No.187/2/2019-ITA-I]

PRAJNA PARAMITA, Director

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago