CBDT exempts income of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India u/s 10(46)
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 1st March, 2023
S.O. 947(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’, New Delhi (PAN AAAGI0193K), a Board established by the Central Government, in respect of the following specified income arising to that Board, namely:
(a) Grants-in-aid received from Central Government;
(b) Fees received under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016);
(c) Fines collected under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016); and(d)Interest income accrued on (a), (b) and (c) above.
2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, New Delhi:-
(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;
(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and
(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. This notification shall be applicable with respect to the financial years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, 2024-2025,2025-2026and 2026-2027.
[F.No.300196/39/2021-ITA-I]
SOURABH JAIN,Under Secy
Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted In a recent judgment and order…
ITAT set aside Penalty u/s 271B as Tax Audit Report was not filed due to strained relationship with CA In…
Unless request made, personal / oral hearing not mandatory and faceless assessment would be concluded without an oral hearing –…
Mere technical mistake made by assessee while filing up return cannot be a ground of disallowing the claim when such…
Denial of Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for agricultural land purchased in the name of wife Supreme Court stays High…
CIT(A) was justified in considering surrounding circumstances, the normal human conduct of a prudent investor, the probabilities to judge creditworthiness…