Income Tax

CBDT increase monetary limits of tax effect for filing appeals by Income Tax Department

CBDT increase monetary limits of tax effect for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department

CBDT has further enhanced the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and Special Leave Petition (SLP)/appeals before Supreme Court.

Earlier CBDT vide Circular No. 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 had revised the monetary limits for filing appeals/SLP by the Department. Exceptions to the Monetary Limits were also provided in the said Circular.

CBDT has issued Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17th September 2024 to further increase/revise the above said monetary limits as under:

Appeals / SLP not falling in the exceptions shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits as under:

Sl. No.Appeals/SLP in Income Tax mattersExisting Monetary Limits (Rs.)Revised Monetary Limits (Rs.)
1.Before Appellate Tribunal50 Lakhs60 Lakhs
2.Before High Court1 Crores 2 Crores
3.Before Supreme Court2 Crores5 Crores

It has been clarified that the above monetary limits shall be applicable to all cases including those related to TDS/TCS under Income Tax Act 1961 with exceptions as per para 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No. 5/2024 where the decision to file appeal/SLP shall be taken on merit, without regard to tax effect.

It has been again clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.

The revision in the monetary limits take effect from 17th September 2024 and shall apply to all appeals/SLP filed henceforth. It is also applicable to all pending appeals/SLPs before the ITAT, High Courts and Supreme Court which the Department has been advised to withdraw.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

If assessee fails to explain source of purchases, estimating profit rate contrary to Section 69C

When assessee failed to explain source of purchases expenditure, estimating profit rate was contrary to provision of Section 69C which…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD for delay

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD on adopting a long process resulting delay…

14 hours ago
  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

2 days ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

2 days ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

3 days ago