Income Tax

CBDT increase monetary limits of tax effect for filing appeals by Income Tax Department

CBDT increase monetary limits of tax effect for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department

CBDT has further enhanced the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and Special Leave Petition (SLP)/appeals before Supreme Court.

Earlier CBDT vide Circular No. 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 had revised the monetary limits for filing appeals/SLP by the Department. Exceptions to the Monetary Limits were also provided in the said Circular.

CBDT has issued Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17th September 2024 to further increase/revise the above said monetary limits as under:

Appeals / SLP not falling in the exceptions shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits as under:

Sl. No.Appeals/SLP in Income Tax mattersExisting Monetary Limits (Rs.)Revised Monetary Limits (Rs.)
1.Before Appellate Tribunal50 Lakhs60 Lakhs
2.Before High Court1 Crores 2 Crores
3.Before Supreme Court2 Crores5 Crores

It has been clarified that the above monetary limits shall be applicable to all cases including those related to TDS/TCS under Income Tax Act 1961 with exceptions as per para 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No. 5/2024 where the decision to file appeal/SLP shall be taken on merit, without regard to tax effect.

It has been again clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.

The revision in the monetary limits take effect from 17th September 2024 and shall apply to all appeals/SLP filed henceforth. It is also applicable to all pending appeals/SLPs before the ITAT, High Courts and Supreme Court which the Department has been advised to withdraw.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Prevention of Corruption Act

CBDT Instruction can not absolve persons to explain source of gold within limits specified – SC

Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…

20 hours ago
  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026. Last date 16.11.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT address some important issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA

ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Mere carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return – ITAT

Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Sales duly recorded in books & VAT returns, can’t be held bogus without cogent adverse material

Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows Diwali expenses incurred by assessee as business expenses

Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…

2 weeks ago