Income Tax

CBDT modifies guidelines/criteria for Complete Scrutiny of ITRs during FY 2022-23

CBDT modifies guidelines/criteria for compulsory selection of Income Tax returns for Complete Scrutiny during the Financial Year 2022-23

Guidelines for compulsory selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the Financial Year 2022-23- procedure for compulsory selection in such cases.

CBDT vide guidelines issued on 11th May 2022 has issued parameters for compulsory selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during Financial Year 2022-23 and procedure for compulsory selection in such cases.

The revised guidelines are as under:

Sl No. Parameter Procedure for compulsory selection
1. Cases pertaining to survey u/s 133A of the Income-tax Act,1961(Act)
 

Returns filed for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which survey was conducted under section 133A of the Act subject to exclusion below:

Exclusion:

Cases, where following conditions are satisfied, are excluded from selection for compulsory scrutiny:

  1. books of accounts, documents, were not impounded;
  2. returned income (excluding any disclosure of  hitherto undisclosed income made during the Survey) is not less than returned income of preceding assessment year; and
  3. assessee has not retracted from the disclosure referred to in point 2 above

The cases shall be selected for compulsory scrutiny with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr. DIT/CIT/DIT concerned, who shall ensure that such cases are transferred to Central Charges u/s 127 of the Act within 15 days of service of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act by the Assessing Officer concerned.

2.3 Cases pertaining to Search and Seizure
  Assessments in Search and Seizure cases to be made under section(s) 153A, 153C read with section 143(3) of the Act and also for return filed for assessment year relevant to previous year in which the Search was conducted under section 132 or requisition was made under section 132A of the Act

The cases shall be selected for compulsory scrutiny with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned, who shall ensure that such cases are transferred to Central Charges u/s 127 of the Act within 15 days of service of notice u/s 143(2)/ 142(1) of the Act by the Assessing Officer concerned

Where such cases are not centralized and Return of Income is filed in response to notice u/s 153C, the Assessing Officer concerned shall serve notice u/s 143(2) of the Act.

Where such cases are not centralized and no Return of Income is filed inresponse to notice u/s 153C, the Assessing Officer concerned shall serve notice u/s 142(1) of the Act calling for information

2.2

Search & seizure/reguisition on or after 01.04.2021: Assessments in cases arising from search & seizure actions/ requisitions u/s 132/ 132A conducted on or after 01.04.2021, for returns pertaining to A.Y. 2021-22

The cases shall be selected for scrutiny with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr. DIT/CIT/DIT concerned, who shall ensure that such cases are transferred to Central Charges u/s 127 of the Act within 15 days of service of notice u/s 143(2)/ 142(1) of the Act by the Assessing Officer concerned

3

Cases in which notices uls 142(1) of the Act, calling for return, have been issued & no returns have been furnished

 

Cases where no return has been furnished in response to a notice u/s 142(1) of the Act.

The Assessing Officer shall upload the underlying documents, on the basis of which notice u/s 142(1) was issued, on ITBA, for access by National Faceless Assessment Centre (NaFAC). The Directorate of Income-tax (Systems) shall forward these cases to NaFAC, which will take further necessary action. Notice u/s 142(1) of the Act calling for information shall be served on the assessee through NaFAC

4

Cases in which notices u/s 148 of the Act have been issued

 

Cases where return is either furnished or not furnished in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act

(i) Cases, where notices u/s 148 of the Act have been issued pursuant to search & seizure/survey actions conducted on or after the 1st day of April, 2021: These cases shall be selected for compulsory scrutiny with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned who shall ensure that such cases, if lying outside Central Charges, are transferred to Central Charges u/s 127 of the Act within 15 days of service of notice u/s 143(2)/142(1) of the Act calling for information by the Assessing Officer concerned.

(ii) Cases not covered in (i) above: The Assessing Officer shall upload the underlying documents, on the basis of which notice u/s 148 was issued, on ITBA, for access by NaFAC.

The Directorate of Income-tax (Systems) shall forward these cases to NaFAC, which will take further necessary action.

Notice u/s 143(2)/142(1) of the Act calling for information shall be served on the assessee through NaFAC

5.

Cases related to registration/ approval under various sections of the Act, such as 12A, 35(1)(ii)/ (iia)/ (iii), 10(23C), etc

  Cases where registration/approval under various sections of the Act, such as section 12A, 35(1)(ii)/ (iia)/ (iii), 10(23C), etc. have not been granted or have been cancelled/ withdrawn by the Competent Authority, yet the assessee has been found to be claiming tax-exemption/deduction in the return. However, where such orders of withdrawal of registration/ approval have been reversed/set-aside in appellate proceedings, those cases will not be selected under this clause

The Assessing Officer shall prepare a list of cases falling under this parameter with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned.

The list of such cases shall be submitted by the Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT to the Pr.CCIT concerned for onward transmission to NaFAC with a copy marked to DGIT (Systems).

Notice u/s 143(2) of the Act shall be served on the assessee through NaFAC

6.

Cases involving addition in an earlier assessment year(s) on a recurring issue of law or fact and/or law and fact

 

Where the addition in an earlier assessment year(s) on a recurring issue of law or fact and/or law and fact (including transfer pricing issue) is:

a. exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs in eight metro charges at Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune;

b. exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs in charges other than eight metro charges;

and where such an addition:

1. has become final, as no further appeal has been preferred against the assessment order; or

2. has been upheld by the Appellate Authorities in favor of Revenue; even if further appeal of assessee is pending, against such order

The Assessing Officer shall prepare a list of cases falling under this parameter with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned.

The list of such cases shall be submitted by the Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT to the Pr.CCIT concerned for onward transmission to NaFAC with a copy marked to DGIT(Systems).

Notice u/s 143(2) of the Act shall be served on the assessee through NaFAC.

7. Cases related to specific information regarding tax-evasion
 

Cases, in respect of which:

(a) specific information pointing out tax- evasion for the relevant assessment year is provided by any law-enforcement agency, (Investigation Wing/ Intelligence/ Regulatory Authority/ Agency, etc.) ;

and

(b) the return for the relevant assessment year is furnished by the assessee

The Assessing Officer shall prepare a list of cases falling under this parameter with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned.

The Assessing Officer shall upload the underlying documents containing specific information regarding tax evasion, for access by NaFAC.

The list of such cases shall be submitted by the Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT to the Pr.CCIT concerned for onward transmission to NaFAC with a copy marked to DGIT (Systems).

Notice u/s 143(2) of the Act shall be served on the assessee through NaFAC.

The cases shall be selected for compulsory scrutiny by the International Taxation and Central Circle charges following the above prescribed parameters and procedure with prior administrative approval of Pr. CIT/Pr.DIT/CIT/DIT concerned. The cases which are selected for compulsory scrutiny by the International Taxation and Central Circle charges following the above prescribed parameters and procedure, shall, as earlier, continue to be handled by these charges.

As per the amendments brought by Finance Act 2021, the time limit for service of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act has been reduced to three months from end of the Financial Year in which the return is filed. Therefore, selection of cases and transfer of cases, wherein assessments have to be completed in faceless manner, to NaFAC shall be completed positively by 31.05.2022. In cases selected for compulsory scrutiny, service of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act shall be completed by 30.06.2022

Download CBDT Revised Guidelines Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

14 hours ago
  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

3 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

4 days ago