CBDT notifies Forms for exercising option for reduced corporate tax rate u/s 158BAA/158BAB

CBDT notifies Forms for exercising option for reduced corporate tax rate u/s 158BAA / 158BAB by domestic companies

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 12th February, 2020

INCOME-TAX

G.S.R. 110(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 115BAA and section 115BAB read with section 295 the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely: –

1. Short title and commencement
(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (4th Amendment) Rules, 2020.
(2) They shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 2020.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), after rule 21AD, the following rules shall be inserted, namely: –

“21AE. Exercise of option under sub-section (5) of section 115BAA

(1) The option to be exercised in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 115BAA by a person, being a domestic company, for any previous year relevant to the assessment year beginning on or after the 1st day of April, 2020, shall be in Form No. 10-IC.

(2) The option in Form No. 10-IC shall be furnished electronically either under digital signature or electronic verification code.

(3) The Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be, shall-

(i) specify the procedure for filing of Form No. 10-IC;

(ii) specify the data structure, standards and manner of generation of electronic verification code, referred to in sub-rule (2), for verification of the person furnishing the said Form; and

(iii) be responsible for formulating and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to the Form so furnished.;

21AF. Exercise of option under sub-section (7) of section 115BAB

(1) The option to be exercised in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (7) of section 115BAB by a person, being a domestic company, for any previous year relevant to the assessment year beginning on or after the 1st day of April, 2020, shall be in Form No. 10-ID.

(2) The option in Form No. 10-ID shall be furnished electronically either under digital signature or electronic verification code.

(3) The Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be, shall-
(i) specify the procedure for filing of Form No. 10-ID;

(ii) specify the data structure, standards and manner of generation of electronic verification code, referred to in sub-rule (2), for verification of the person furnishing the said Form; and

(iii) be responsible for formulating and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies in relation to the Form so furnished.”.

3. In the principal rules, in Appendix II, after Form No. 10-IB, the following Forms shall be inserted, namely: –

“FORM No. 10-IC
[See sub-rule (1) of rule 21AE]
Application for exercise of option under sub-section (5) of section 115BAA of the Income – tax Act, 1961

FORM No. 10-ID
[See sub-rule (1) of rule 21AF]
Application for exercise of option under sub-section (7) of section 115BAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961

[F. No. 370142/34/2019-TPL]

NEHA SAHAY, Under Secy.
(Tax Policy and Legislation Division)

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, subsection (ii), vide notification number S.O. 969(E) dated the 26th March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number G.S.R. No. 56(E) dated the 29th January, 2020.

Download Notification Click Here >>

• Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains considering intention of assessee
• Interest liability recognised by journal entries at the close of year, can’t be termed as fictitious – ITAT
• Cash deposits in bank which were immediately transferred to other accounts – addition deleted
• ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases being appropriate
• CBDT can’t restrict power of CIT u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years – High Court