Income Tax

CBDT notifies Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2024

CBDT Notifies the Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2024. Income /Loss and ITDS employee may report to employer in Form12BA

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 112/2024

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2024

G.S.R. 639(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:–

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2024.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962,––

(a) in rule 21AA, –

(i) in the marginal heading, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(ii) for the words, brackets and figures “sub-section (1) of section 89”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(b) for rule 26B, the following rule shall be substituted, namely :–

“26B. Statement of particulars of income under heads of income other than “Salaries” or details of tax deducted at source or tax collected at source.–– The assessee may submit to the person responsible for making payment under sub-section (1) of section 192, the details of ––

(a) any income chargeable under any head of income other than ‘Salaries’ received in the same financial year; or

(b) any tax deducted at source or tax collected at source under the provisions of Part B or Part BB of Chapter XVII, for the same financial year; or

(c) loss, if any, under the head “Income from house property” in the same financial year, in Form No. 12BAA, for the purpose of computing the tax deduction at source under sub-section (1) of section 192.”;

(c) in Appendix II,––

(A) in Form No. 10E, –

(i) in the heading, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(ii) in Annexure I, against serial number 8, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(iii) in Annexure II, against serial number 12, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(iv) in Annexure IIA, against serial number 12, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(v) in Annexure III, against serial number 12, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(vi) in Annexure IV, against serial number 12, for the word, figures and brackets “section 89(1)”, the word and figures “section 89” shall be substituted;

(B) after Form No. 12BA, the following Form shall be inserted, namely –

“FORM NO. 12BAA
[See rule 26B]
Statement showing particulars for the purposes of sub-section (2B) of section 192

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) vide notification number S.O. 969 (E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number G.S.R 638 (E), dated the 15th October, 2024

Download Notification No. 112/2024 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order rejecting stay of income tax demand should recite merits if it is a case for stay or not

In an order rejecting stay of income tax demand there should be a recital of the merits whether it is…

5 days ago