Income Tax

CBDT revises 55 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

CBDT revises 55 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

CBDT revises 55 FAQs on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme

During the Union Budget, 2020 presentation, the ‘Vivad se Yishwas‘ Scheme was announced to provide for dispute resolution in respect of pending income tax litigation. Pursuant to Budget announcement, the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill , 2020 (the Bill) was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 5th Feb, 2020. Subsequently, based on the representations received from the stakeholders regarding its various provisions, official amendments to tlte Bill were proposed. These amendments sought to widen the scope of the bill and reduce the compliance burden on taxpayears.

After introduction of the bill in Lok Sabha, several queries were received from the stakeholders seeking clarifications in respect of various provisions contained therein. Government had considered these queries and had decided to clarify the same in form of answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) vide circular no 7 of 2020 dated  41 March  2020.  These clarifications were, however, subject to approval and passing of the bill by the Parliament and receiving assent of the Hon’ble President of India.

The Bill has since been passed by the Parliament and has also received  the assent  of the Hon’ble President of India and has now been enacted as The Direct Tax Vivad Se Yishwas Act, 2020 (Vivad se Viswas). The objective of Vivad se Vishwas is to inter alia reduce pen ding income tax litigation, generate timely revenue for the Government and benefit taxpayers by providing them peace of mind , certainty and savings on account of time and resources  that would otherwise be spent on the long-drawn and vexatious litigation process.

Revised FAQ on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme

The 55 questions contained  in  the CBDT circular no 7 of  2020, have been modified vide Circular No. 9 of 2020 dated 22.04.2020 as under:

1. Vivad se Vishwas refened to Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill , 2020 in circular no However, in this circular it refers to The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020;

2. Since clauses  of  the  Bill  have  now  become  sections  in  the  Vivad Se  Vishwas, the reference to ”clause” in circular no 7 has been replaced with “section”;

3. Reference to declaration form in circular no 7 has been replaced with referencing of relevant form, since rules and forms have now been notified ; and

4. Answer to question no 22 has been modified to reflect the correct intent of the law. It has now been clarified that where only notice for initiation of prosecution has been issued without prosecution being instituted, the assessee is eligible to file declaration under Vivad se Vishwas. However, where the prosecution has been instituted with respect to an assessment year, the assessee is not eligible to file declaration for that assessment year under Vivad se Vishwas, unless the prosecution is compounded before filing the declaration

Download Revised FAQ on Vivad se Vishwas Scheme Click Here >> 

CBDT further issued a Corrigenda dated 27.04.2020 to Circular No. 9/2020 as under:

“In the Circular No. 9/2020 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct taxes), issued on the 22nd April, 2020,-

(i) in the answer to question number I, for the word ” Bill” read the word “Act”; and

(ii) in the answer to question numbers 26,28, 29 and 41 for the figures, letters and word “31” March, 2020″, wherever they occur, read the figures, letters and word “30’h June, 2020”.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

12 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

20 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago