CBDT shares e-filed ITRs statistics for last 8 years to justify that there is no decline though there is visible negative growth of -0.99%
CBDT has made available comparative Income Tax Return e-filing statistics to strengthen its claim that there is no decline in the number of e-filed ITRs.
Yesterday , the CBDT had issued a Press Release denying the news reported in media that number of e-filed returns during FY 2018-19 has declined.
|
Few illustrative statistics for the month of April 2019 are as under:
Highlights of e-Filing |
|
| No of Registered Users as on 30/04/2019 | 8,47,34,774 |
| Percentage of returns filed using Utility provided by Department | 58.29% |
| Percentage of returns filed outside office hours | 54.80% |
| ITR Wise receipt of e-Return April,2019 | ||||
| S.No. | ITR | FY 2017-18 | FY 2018-19 | FY 2019-20 |
| 1 | ITR-1 | 2,90,67,029 | 3,17,00,240 | 1,58,717 |
| 2 | ITR-2(Till AY 2016-17) | 3,76,948 | 43,752 | 8,469 |
| 3 | ITR-2(From AY 2017-18) | 46,55,177 | 47,77,808 | 13,128 |
| 4 | ITR-2A(For AY 2015-16 & 2016-17) | 3,13,934 | 5,460 | 89 |
| 5 | ITR-3(Till AY 2016-17) | 1,75,896 | 9,584 | 1,957 |
| 6 | ITR-3(From AY 2017-18) | 99,08,934 | 1,25,11,740 | 26,899 |
| 7 | ITR-4S(Till AY 2016-17) | 44,95,327 | 77,283 | 2,684 |
| 8 | ITR-4(Till AY 2016-17) | 29,85,995 | 1,21,011 | 11,610 |
| 9 | ITR-4(From AY 2017-18) | 1,27,61,551 | 1,47,73,246 | 1,58,029 |
| 10 | ITR-5 | 15,12,496 | 15,57,596 | 7,464 |
| 11 | ITR-6 | 9,38,620 | 9,62,573 | 13,051 |
| 12 | ITR-7 | 2,82,997 | 2,68,836 | 2,805 |
| Total | 6,74,74,904 | 6,68,09,129 | 4,04,902 | |
FY 2017-18 => From 01/04/2017 to 31/03/2018 FY 2018-19 => From 01/04/2018 to 31/03/2019 FY 2019-20 => From 01/04/2019 to 30/04/2019U
| Count from 01-Apr-2019 to 30-Apr-2019 | |||
| ITR | AY 2018-19 | AY 2019-20 | Increase(%) |
| ITR-1 Offline | 41,918 | 46,497 | 10.92 |
| ITR-1 Online | 70,735 | 1,02,408 | 44.78 |
| ITR-1 Sub Total | 1,12,653 | 1,48,905 | 32.18 |
| ITR-2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| ITR-3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| ITR-4 Offline | 0 | 55,000 | 100.00 |
| ITR-4 Online | 0 | 92,564 | 100.00 |
| ITR 4 Sub Total | 0 | 1,47,564 | 100.00 |
| ITR-5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| ITR-6 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| ITR-7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Total | 1,12,653 | 2,96,469 | 163.17 |
| State wise filing count for current Financial Year | ||
| S.No. | State | Count |
| 1 | ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS (UT) | 93 |
| 2 | ANDHRA PRADESH | 8,876 |
| 3 | ARUNACHAL PRADESH | 136 |
| 4 | ASSAM | 4,896 |
| 5 | BIHAR | 14,371 |
| 6 | CHANDIGARH (UT) | 1,665 |
| 7 | CHHATTISGARH | 5,073 |
| 8 | DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI (UT) | 173 |
| 9 | DAMAN & DIU (UT) | 130 |
| 10 | DELHI (UT) | 17,005 |
| 11 | GOA | 1,052 |
| 12 | GUJARAT | 46,533 |
| 13 | HARYANA | 18,971 |
| 14 | HIMACHAL PRADESH | 3,350 |
| 15 | JAMMU & KASHMIR | 3,255 |
| 16 | JHARKHAND | 5,928 |
| 17 | KARNATAKA | 13,500 |
| 18 | KERALA | 5,894 |
| 19 | LAKSHADWEEP (UT) | 6 |
| 20 | MADHYA PRADESH | 15,193 |
| 21 | MAHARASHTRA | 58,759 |
| 22 | MANIPUR | 281 |
| 23 | MEGHALAYA | 467 |
| 24 | MIZORAM | 20 |
| 25 | NAGALAND | 138 |
| 26 | ORISSA | 5,795 |
| 27 | PONDICHERRY (UT) | 422 |
| 28 | PUNJAB | 38,169 |
| 29 | RAJASTHAN | 23,283 |
| 30 | SIKKIM | 130 |
| 31 | FROM STATES OUTSIDE INDIA | 389 |
| 32 | TAMILNADU | 23,127 |
| 33 | TELANGANA | 11,832 |
| 34 | TRIPURA | 509 |
| 35 | UTTAR PRADESH | 33,442 |
| 36 | UTTARAKHAND | 4,872 |
| 37 | WEST BENGAL | 37,167 |
| Total | 4,04,902 | |
Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…
Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…
Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…
Reassessment quashed as AO issued u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on incriminating material found during search…
Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/Cost Accountant/Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. has invited application for…
Individual contract for booking of persons for participation in an event is not “event management” contracts liable to service tax…