Income Tax

CBDT specifies cases to be contested on merits notwithstanding tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

CBDT specifies cases to be contested on merits notwithstanding tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 increasing threshold monetary limits for Appeals

F No 279/Misc.  142/2007-ITJ (Pt)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board Direct Taxes

New Delhi the 20th August, 2018

To,
All the Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax

Subject:  Amendment to para 10 of the Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018-reg:

Madam/Sir ,

Kindly refer to the above.

2. The monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court have been revised by Board’s Circular 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018.

3. Para 10 of the said Circular provides that adverse judgments relating to the issues  enumerated  in  the  said  para  should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 thereof or there is no tax Para 10 of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 is hereby amended as under:

“10.  Adverse judgments relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect:

(a)  Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge, or 

(b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or

(c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department , or

(d) Where addition relates to undisclosed foreign income/ undisclosed foreign assets (including financial assets}/ undisclosed foreign bank account

(e) Where addition is based on information received from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies such as CBII ED/ DR!/ SF/0/ Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI).

(f) Cases where prosecution has been filed by the Department and is pending in the Court.

4. The said modification shall come into effect from the date of issue of this letter.

5. The same may be brought to the knowledge of all officers working in your region.

6. This issues with the approval of the Hon’ble Finance Minister.

(Neetika Banlai)
Director (ITJ), CBDT, New Delhi.

Copy to:

  1. The Chairman, Members and all other officers in CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above
  2. ADG (PR,  PP& OL),  Mayur  Bhawan,  New  Delhi  for printing  in  the quarterly Tax Bulletin and for circulation as per usual mailing list
  3. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India
  4. ADG (Vigilance), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi
  5. The Joint Secretary  &  Legal  Advisor,  Ministry  of  Law  & Justice,  New Delhi
  6. All Directorates of Income-tax, New Delhi and DGIT (NADT), Nagpur
  7. ITCC (3 copies) .
  8. The ADG (System)-4, for uploading on the Department’s website
  9. Data Base Cell for uploading on gov.in.
  10. njrs_support@nsdl.co.in for uploading on NJRS
  11. Hindi Cell for translation
  12. Guard file.
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago