Income Tax

CBDT specifies cases to be contested on merits notwithstanding tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018

CBDT specifies cases to be contested on merits notwithstanding tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 increasing threshold monetary limits for Appeals

F No 279/Misc.  142/2007-ITJ (Pt)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board Direct Taxes

New Delhi the 20th August, 2018

To,
All the Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax

Subject:  Amendment to para 10 of the Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018-reg:

Madam/Sir ,

Kindly refer to the above.

2. The monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court have been revised by Board’s Circular 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018.

3. Para 10 of the said Circular provides that adverse judgments relating to the issues  enumerated  in  the  said  para  should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 thereof or there is no tax Para 10 of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 is hereby amended as under:

“10.  Adverse judgments relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect:

(a)  Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge, or 

(b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or

(c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department , or

(d) Where addition relates to undisclosed foreign income/ undisclosed foreign assets (including financial assets}/ undisclosed foreign bank account

(e) Where addition is based on information received from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies such as CBII ED/ DR!/ SF/0/ Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI).

(f) Cases where prosecution has been filed by the Department and is pending in the Court.

4. The said modification shall come into effect from the date of issue of this letter.

5. The same may be brought to the knowledge of all officers working in your region.

6. This issues with the approval of the Hon’ble Finance Minister.

(Neetika Banlai)
Director (ITJ), CBDT, New Delhi.

Copy to:

  1. The Chairman, Members and all other officers in CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above
  2. ADG (PR,  PP& OL),  Mayur  Bhawan,  New  Delhi  for printing  in  the quarterly Tax Bulletin and for circulation as per usual mailing list
  3. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India
  4. ADG (Vigilance), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi
  5. The Joint Secretary  &  Legal  Advisor,  Ministry  of  Law  & Justice,  New Delhi
  6. All Directorates of Income-tax, New Delhi and DGIT (NADT), Nagpur
  7. ITCC (3 copies) .
  8. The ADG (System)-4, for uploading on the Department’s website
  9. Data Base Cell for uploading on gov.in.
  10. njrs_support@nsdl.co.in for uploading on NJRS
  11. Hindi Cell for translation
  12. Guard file.
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

14 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

23 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago