Income Tax

CIT(Appeals) must pass speaking order even in ex-parte cases. Appeal dismissed in limine for non appearnace remanded back by ITAT

CIT Appeals must pass speaking order even in ex-parte cases. ITAT Delhi, in a recent case remanded back the appeal of the assessee which was dismissed in limine by CIT(A) for non appearnace. 

Case Law Details:
I.T.A .No.-2379/Del/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2010-11)
Abhinav Dwivedi vs ITO
Date of Judgment/Order: 04/05/2016

Brief Facts of the Case:
The appeal in reference was filed by the appellant assessee challenging the correctness of the order of CIT(A), Ghaziabad. CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order and dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine on the ground that no one was present on assessee’s behalf on various dates fixed for hearing.

Important Excerpts from ITAT Judgment:

On consideration of the impugned order, we find that the statutory mandate of the Act has not been followed by the Ld. CIT(A) in deciding the appeal. Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 mandates that the CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order, the specific sub-section is reproduced hereunder for ready-reference:-

250.
“(1) ………………………………………….
(2) …………………………………………………
(3) …………………………………………………
(4) ………………………………………………….
(5) ………………………………………………….
(6) The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) disposing of the appeal shall be in writing and shall state the points for determination, the decision thereon and the reason for the decision. (6A)………………………………………………………….”

The specific provision requires the First Appellate Authority to set out points for determination and the decision thereon supported by reasons for arriving at a conclusion. The said mandatory exercise in the aforesaid provision in the peculiar facts of the present case is found to be not fulfilled. Accordingly holding the impugned order violative of the statutory mandate it is set aside back to the file of the CIT(A) to make good the statutory deficit. Needless to say that before passing the order, a reasonable opportunity shall be provided to the assessee. While so directing it is hoped that the opportunity so provided is not abused by the assessee and is utilized in good faith as failing which the Ld. CIT(A) would be at liberty to pass a speaking order in accordance with law on the basis of material available on record.

download full judgment

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

7 days ago