Income Tax

Correction of minor head IDS challan for mistake by taxpayers or bank

Correction of minor head of IDS challan (111) by mistake by taxpayer or data entry mistake committed by bank branch

OLTAS INSTRUCTION NO. 54

DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEM)
ARA Center, Ground Floor, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension
New Delhi -110055

F. No. SW/07/01/06/OLTAS INSTRUCTION/DIT(S)II/15276 

Dated: 20.12.2018

To
The Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/ Chief Commissioners of Income-tax
The Principal Commissioners of  Income-tax Commissioners of Income-tax
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Admin & TPS)

Sub: Correction in minor head of IDS challan attributes to Normal challan (Advance, Self etc)- reg

Sir/Madam,

Kindly refer to OLTAS Instruction No. 53 dated 13.02.2017 which explains the guidelines for correction in challan attributes in respect of IDS, 2016 payments. The Para 2.4 of the above instruction mentions that ‘No request for changing IDS payments (111) to other payments (advance tax, self-assessment tax etc.) will be carried out presently i.e. correction of minor head of an IDS challan to normal challan was not allowed.

2. However, many requests from taxpayers and field formations have been received for the correction of minor head of IDS challan (111) to Advance, Self, Regular etc and other attributes like PAN, AY and major head of such challans.

3. In light of the above grievances, the guidelines approved by Board for correction in minor head attribute of IDS challans are as under:

3.1 Mistake in minor head committed by taxpayer: If taxpayer  had  intended  to  pay normal tax other than tax under IDS. 2016 but by mistake wrong challan and head was selected at the time of payment then correction of challan attributes will be subject to:

(i) The recommendation of the concerned CIT to the ADG(S)-2, New Delhi and

(ii) The confirmation from efiling unit that the taxpayer has not filed Form -1 OR has not claimed the subject challan in Form-3.

3.2 Data entry mistake in minor head committed by bank branch : If a taxpayer had selected correct heads for tax payments under IDS  but  bank branch  had  populated wrong minor head at the time of data entry then correction of challan attributes will be subject to:

(i) The request from bank  branch  who  has committed  the data entry mistake, and

(ii) The recommendation   from  the  concerned  Pr. CIT  to  the  ADG(S)-2,  New Delhi, and

(iii) The confimation from efiling unit that the taxpayer has not filed Form -1 OR has not claimed the subject challan in Form-3.

4. The CsIT may refer to the proof of tax payment mentioned in Form-3 to assess whether the taxpayer’s request for change in challan attributes appears to be a bonafide mistake and the subject challan has not been claimed as proof of payment. In case the error in minor head has occurred due to data entry mistake by bank branch then a letter from concerned bank branch should also be sent along with the recommendation of Pr.CIT.

5. The above instruction may kindly  be  communicated to the field. This instruction is also available at i-taxnet.

6. This issues with the approval DGIT(S), New Delhi.

(Sanjeev Singh)
Addl. Director General (Systems) -2

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago