Income Tax

Correction of minor head IDS challan for mistake by taxpayers or bank

Correction of minor head of IDS challan (111) by mistake by taxpayer or data entry mistake committed by bank branch

OLTAS INSTRUCTION NO. 54

DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEM)
ARA Center, Ground Floor, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension
New Delhi -110055

F. No. SW/07/01/06/OLTAS INSTRUCTION/DIT(S)II/15276 

Dated: 20.12.2018

To
The Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/ Chief Commissioners of Income-tax
The Principal Commissioners of  Income-tax Commissioners of Income-tax
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Admin & TPS)

Sub: Correction in minor head of IDS challan attributes to Normal challan (Advance, Self etc)- reg

Sir/Madam,

Kindly refer to OLTAS Instruction No. 53 dated 13.02.2017 which explains the guidelines for correction in challan attributes in respect of IDS, 2016 payments. The Para 2.4 of the above instruction mentions that ‘No request for changing IDS payments (111) to other payments (advance tax, self-assessment tax etc.) will be carried out presently i.e. correction of minor head of an IDS challan to normal challan was not allowed.

2. However, many requests from taxpayers and field formations have been received for the correction of minor head of IDS challan (111) to Advance, Self, Regular etc and other attributes like PAN, AY and major head of such challans.

3. In light of the above grievances, the guidelines approved by Board for correction in minor head attribute of IDS challans are as under:

3.1 Mistake in minor head committed by taxpayer: If taxpayer  had  intended  to  pay normal tax other than tax under IDS. 2016 but by mistake wrong challan and head was selected at the time of payment then correction of challan attributes will be subject to:

(i) The recommendation of the concerned CIT to the ADG(S)-2, New Delhi and

(ii) The confirmation from efiling unit that the taxpayer has not filed Form -1 OR has not claimed the subject challan in Form-3.

3.2 Data entry mistake in minor head committed by bank branch : If a taxpayer had selected correct heads for tax payments under IDS  but  bank branch  had  populated wrong minor head at the time of data entry then correction of challan attributes will be subject to:

(i) The request from bank  branch  who  has committed  the data entry mistake, and

(ii) The recommendation   from  the  concerned  Pr. CIT  to  the  ADG(S)-2,  New Delhi, and

(iii) The confimation from efiling unit that the taxpayer has not filed Form -1 OR has not claimed the subject challan in Form-3.

4. The CsIT may refer to the proof of tax payment mentioned in Form-3 to assess whether the taxpayer’s request for change in challan attributes appears to be a bonafide mistake and the subject challan has not been claimed as proof of payment. In case the error in minor head has occurred due to data entry mistake by bank branch then a letter from concerned bank branch should also be sent along with the recommendation of Pr.CIT.

5. The above instruction may kindly  be  communicated to the field. This instruction is also available at i-taxnet.

6. This issues with the approval DGIT(S), New Delhi.

(Sanjeev Singh)
Addl. Director General (Systems) -2

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

2 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Unless medical certificate are held forged & fictitious, appeal can’t be rejected on ground of delay

Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…

5 days ago