Income Tax

CPC(TDS) Advisory-Deposit TDS and TDS Defaults Demand for Purchase of Immovable Property (26QB Statement-cum-challan)

CPC(TDS) Advisory for Deposit of Tax deducted and Demand for TDS Defaults with respect to Purchase of Immovable Property (26QB Statement-cum-challan)

The Centralized Processing Cell (TDS) provides important tips, for the convenience of Taxpayers, who have executed any transaction for Purchase of Immovable Property exceeding Rs. 50 Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs). Please take note of the following key details for Payments associated with filing of 26QB Statements-cum-challan and TDS Defaults, if any:

Filing of 26QB Statement-cum-Challan:

1. 26QB Statement-cum-challan can be filed (along with payment of tax), under “Form 26QB” in “TDS on Sale of Property”on the payment portal of NSDL.

2. The tax to be deposited only through the Statement-cum-Challan mode (Form 26QB). No other challan, viz. Demand Payment, 280/ 281 etc. to be used for the same.

Payment against TDS Defaults:

1. On receipt of Default Intimations from CPC(TDS), the Payment against demand raised should be made through the Demand Payment link at NSDL portal, as follows:

2. The payment of Demand for closure of Defaults has to be made only through the above online mode. No other challan, viz. 280/ 281 etc. should be used for payment of demand.

CPC (TDS) is committed to provide best possible services to you.

CPC (TDS) TEAM

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago