Income Tax

Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed

Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed when he was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to sold house

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2971 (2019) (05) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:

In this appeal, the assessee had challenged the order of the CIT(A) in upholding the action of Assessing Officer (AO) in not allowing the claim of deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in respect of house property purchased from father in law.

The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A). However, the appeal of assessee was dismissed.

The Tribunal observed that in the case of the father in law (seller) the department had issued notice uls 148 on the basis of information that he had sold house to the assessee.

The Tribunal further noted that in the assessment order of the said father in law passed u/s 143(3)/147 a finding was given that possession was handed over to the buyer and the transaction relating to the sale of immovable property stood completed Accordingly, on sale of the house, the father in law was assessed at long term capital gain. Against this order the father in law had preferred an appeal before ITAT who allowed the indexed cost of acquisition. The order had become final.

Thus, the Tribunal opined that when the seller was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to the sale of his property, claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 54F in respect of the same house property could not be denied to assessee.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow assessee’s claim of deduction U/s 54F of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago