Income Tax

Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed

Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed when he was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to sold house

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2971 (2019) (05) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:

In this appeal, the assessee had challenged the order of the CIT(A) in upholding the action of Assessing Officer (AO) in not allowing the claim of deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in respect of house property purchased from father in law.

The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A). However, the appeal of assessee was dismissed.

The Tribunal observed that in the case of the father in law (seller) the department had issued notice uls 148 on the basis of information that he had sold house to the assessee.

The Tribunal further noted that in the assessment order of the said father in law passed u/s 143(3)/147 a finding was given that possession was handed over to the buyer and the transaction relating to the sale of immovable property stood completed Accordingly, on sale of the house, the father in law was assessed at long term capital gain. Against this order the father in law had preferred an appeal before ITAT who allowed the indexed cost of acquisition. The order had become final.

Thus, the Tribunal opined that when the seller was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to the sale of his property, claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 54F in respect of the same house property could not be denied to assessee.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow assessee’s claim of deduction U/s 54F of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago