Income Tax

Determination of fair market value for inventory of immovable property, jewellery etc. Rule 11UAB

Rule 11UAB-Determination of fair market value for inventory of immovable property, jewellery, paintings, sculptures, work of art, shares securities etc.

Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Direct Taxes

Notification No. 42/2018

New Delhi, the 30th August, 2018

S.O. 4213(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (via) of section 28 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), hereinafter referred to as the Income-tax Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (9th Amendment), Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force from the 1st day of April, 2019 and shall apply in relation to assessment year 2019-20 and subsequent years.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962,-
(a) in rule 11U, in clause (b), for sub-clause (ii), the following sub-clause shall be substituted, namely:—

“(ii) in any other case,—

(A) in relation to an Indian company, the balance-sheet of such company (including the notes annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) as drawn up on the valuation date which has been audited by the auditor of the company appointed under the laws relating to companies in force; and

(B) in relation to a company, not being an Indian company, the balance-sheet of the company (including the notes annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) as drawn up on the valuation date which has been audited by the auditor of the company, if any, appointed under the laws in force of the country in which the company is registered or incorporated;”;

(b) after rule 11UAA, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:

“11UAB. Determination of fair market value for inventory-

(1) For the purposes of clause (via) of section 28 of the Act, the fair market value of the inventory,—

(i) being an immovable property, being land or building or both, shall be the value adopted or assessed or assessable by any authority of the Central Government or a State Government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in respect of such immovable property on the date on which the inventory is converted into, or treated, as a capital asset;

(ii) being jewellery, archaeological collections, drawings, paintings, sculptures, any work of art, shares or securities referred to in rule 11UA, shall be the value determined in the manner provided in sub-rule (1) of rule 11UA and for this purpose the reference to the valuation date in the rule 11U and rule 11UA shall be the date on which the inventory is converted into, or treated, as a capital asset;

(iii) being the property, other than those specified in clause (i) and clause (ii), the price that such property would ordinarily fetch on sale in the open market on the date on which the inventory is converted into, or treated, as a capital asset.”

[F. No. 370142/05/2018-TPL]

PRAVIN RAWAL, Director (TPL-II)

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India vide notification No. S.O. 969(E), dated the 26th March, 1962, and was last amended by vide notification number G.S.R. 666(E), dated 20.07.2018.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago