Income Tax

Difference in CPC Demand and Central Action Plan CAP-1. Income Tax Department study shows PrCCIT Regions-wise un-reconciled differences.

Difference in CPC Demand and Central Action Plan CAP-1. Income Tax Department study shows PrCCIT Regions -wise unreconciled differences.

Directorate of Income Tax has issued a letter to all Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax (PrCCIT) stating that it has observed noticeable differences in the amount of demand as reported in CAP-1 statement and the data appearing on CPC portal.

The letter has stressed that in view of use of technology in Departmental functioning, it is necessary that statistics of Demand (the tax due to Department) as appearing in CAP-1 of each Pr. CCIT Region should be reconciled with the database on e-portals so that this information could become a reliable tool for policy formulation and performance appraisal.

The letter indicates that the Directorate had conducted a comparative study of the demand figures as on 31-03-2016 in respect of all the Pr. CCIT regions which was based on the demand figures reported by in CAP-I report vis-d-vis data obtained from CPC-ITR, Bengaluru.  As per the study, there are marked variations in figures as reported in CAP-1 report and that taken from the CPC-ITR, Bengaluru.

The reported differences were as under:

Region Outstanding Demand as per CAP-1 for April-2016 CPC Demand as on 31/03/2016 (AST+CPC+DCR) Difference
Karnataka & Goa 49504 346975 -297471
INTL Taxation 105864 344306 -238442
Nagpur 1406 8961 -7555
Odisha 4054 6471 -2417
UP(West) & Uttarakhand 8219 9694 -1475
NER 1369 1469 -100
KERALA 5408 5244 164
UP(East) 15438 15208 230
MP & Chaittasgarh 11270 10474 796
Rajasthan 4276 3478 798
AP & Telengana 32184 29991 2193
West Bengal & Skkim 75035 71542 3493
Bihar & Jharkhand 6652 3020 3632
Pune 25044 21356 3688
Gujarat 25564 21569 3995
Tamilnadu 38390 32580 5810
NWR 16632 9543 7089
Delhi 144635 78293 66342
Mumbai 358901 138417 220484
Total 929845 1158591 -228746

As suggested in the letter, the difference in the demand figures as reported in CAP-1 report and that reflected in CPC may be due to any of the following fact:

(i) The correct figures of demand have not been uploaded;
(ii) The entire demand standing on the records of the AO has not been uploaded;
(iii) Any other reason which may require corrective action at the end of AO.

All Assessing Officers have been advised to eliminate the said differences by following guidelineg issued for uploading and rectification of demand on CPC and following instructions of CBDT:

AST Instruction No.82
Instruction No.4/2014
Circular No.8/2015

All the Pr. CCIT have been requested to issue necessary directions to all concerned Assessing officers to ensure reconciliation of the demand available with them with the figures of CPC-ITR Bengaluru. The exercise of reconciliation is required to be completed by 31.10.2016 positively.

Download the Letter Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted penalty for making a wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B

Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…

1 day ago
  • GST

Value of taxable supply and rates notified Pan Masala / tobacco products

CBIC notifies GST rates and value of taxable supply for Biris, Pan Masala / tobacco products  Ministry of Finance(Department of…

1 day ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SOP for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers in Baggage Clearance

CBIC has issued a Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers responsible for Baggage Clearance According…

2 days ago