Income Tax

Dismissal of appeal without issuing defect memo for delay unjustified

Dismissal of appeal without issuing defect memo for delay in filing the appeal-It is well settled that nobody should be condemned unheard

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2756 (2019) (01) ITAT

The assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in holding the appeal as belated and hence not admitting the same.

The Assessing Officer (AO) on the basis of AIR information regarding the cash deposits in the saving bank account of the assessee, asked the assessee u/s 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to explain the source of cash deposited.

Since, there was no response from the assessee’s side, the AO issued the notice u/s 148 r.w.s. 147 of the Act. Thereafter, the assessee filed the copy of return of income.

The AO, however, framed the assessment by making the addition of cash deposited.

Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter to the CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal by observing that it was delayed and the assessee had not filed any application for condonation of delay.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that no defect memo was issued by the CIT(A) and the appeal filed before her was within time. Therefore, the CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal by considering the same as belated.  

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) without issuing defect memo relating to delay in filing the appeal dismissed the appeal in limine.

The Tribunal said that it is well settled that nobody should be condemned unheard as per the maxim “audi alteram partem”.

Accordingly, the matter was set aside back to the file of the CIT(A) to be decided afresh n accordance with law after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assesse.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

2 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

3 days ago