Income Tax

Dismissing appeal ex-parte by CIT(A) on very first date of hearing unjustified – ITAT

Dismissing appeal ex-parte by CIT(A) on very first date of hearing without giving proper opportunity to the assessee to prepare the case was unjustified – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2906 (2019) (05) ITAT

The appeal by Assessee was directed against the Order of the CIT(A) whereby he had denied the adjournment sought and ex-parte dismissed the appeal of the assessee.

The CIT(A) had noted in the impugned order that the assessee has filed the appeal online. However, only Form-35 was available on the website of the Department but the impugned penalty order and copy of the demand notice was not available on record.

Notice was issued to the assessee for hearing of the appeal. The assessee through their Counsel filed an application requesting for adjournment because written submissions and paper book was under preparation and compilation. However, no Power of Attorney and other details had been produced.

The CIT(A) did not accept the request for adjournment and in the absence of assessee, dismissed the appeal of assessee.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee submitted that it was the first date of hearing of the appeal, on which, no adjournment had been granted to the assessee. Therefore, no proper opportunity of hearing of the appeal had been granted to him.

He further submitted that it was an appeal against the quantum assessment order. However, the CIT(A) wrongly mentioned in the impugned order that impugned penalty order was not available on the website of the department.

The assessee referred to electronic appeal filed with CIT(A), in which, details of the challan had been mentioned and in the annexures, copy of the demand along with order appealed, had been filed with the O/o. CIT(A).

The Tribunal noted that facts clearly showed that there was no fault attributable to the assessee in filing the relevant documents along with the appeal papers. The CIT(A) on the very first date of hearing of the appeal proceeded ex-parte without giving proper opportunity to the assessee to prepare the case. The request for adjournment in writing was made seeking only 20 days time.

The Tribunal opined that facts clearly showed that impugned order was wholly unjustified and was liable to be set aside.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the appeal of assessee to the file of CIT(A) with direction to re-decide the appeal of assessee on merits strictly as per Law.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence no merger with order u/s 143(3) – ITAT

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence the doctrine of merger with order u/s 143(3) do not arise -…

2 hours ago
  • GST

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision to disclose route of transportation of goods

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision which bounds selling dealer to disclose route to be taken during transportation…

4 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Restrictions on use of words “Nidhi Limited”-The Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2024

Restrictions on use of words Nidhi Limited unless declared as such under section 406(1). Nidhi (Amendment) Rules 2024 MINISTRY OF…

5 hours ago
  • Companies Act

MCA prescribes period & fee for updating directors personal mobile number & email

MCA prescribes period and fee for updating of Directors personal mobile number or email address by e-form DIR-3 KYC  MINISTRY…

6 hours ago
  • GST

GST e-invoice-1 and e-invoice-2 Portals to be launched from 18.07.2024

Integrated Services from NIC-IRP e-invoice-1 and e-invoice-2 Portals GSTN has informed that NIC is releasing the integrated services from e-invoice-1…

12 hours ago
  • Companies Act

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2024

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2024. MCA amends Form No. BEN-2 Return to the Registrar under section 90…

13 hours ago