Income Tax

DRS Scheme 2016-Commissioner Appeal to familiarize assesseee with provisions for cases under appeal before CIT(A) as per CBDT direction

DRS Scheme 2016-Commissioner Appeal to familiarize assesseee with provisions for cases under appeal before CIT(A) as per CBDT direction.

F No. 279/Misc/M-61/2016
Government of India
Ministry  of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, Dated: 26th September, 2016

To,
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax

Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (IT&TP)
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)

Madam/Sir ,

Subject: Implementation of the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme,2016- Reg.

As a measure to improve the awareness of the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016 among the appellants who are most likely to take the advantage of Scheme, it has been decided to focus attention on appellants whose cases are under hearing before the Commissioner (Appeal).

2. In view of the same it has been decided that CIT (A) under your jurisdiction may be directed to append the “Flyer” without signature as per Annexure enclosed while sending the notice for hearing to the assessee to familiarize him with this Scheme.

This issues with the approval of Member (A&J) CBDT.

Yours faithfully

D.S. Rathi
DCIT(OSD)(ITJ)
CBDT

Annexure

Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016

The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016, The (Scheme) was introduced with effect from 01.06.2016. The primary aim is to reduce tax payer grievance and uncertainly caused due to long pending litigation before the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals). Whereas, litigation before CIT (A) is disputed chronologically and is dependent on tax effect, the Scheme provides an outer limit of 120 days for resolution of the pending matters. Practically, this period would be much shorter.

2. The Scheme provides for further relief in the following ways:

(i) Tax payable would include tax & interest till the date of assessment. Interest accrued  thereafter would not form part of tax payable.

(ii) If and disputed tax is below 10 lakhs. penalty would stand waived on payment of tax & interest.

(iii) Where the disputed tax is more than 10 lakhs, penalty of 75% would stand waived on payment of tax, interest and 25% of penalty levied/leviable.

(iv) In the case of a penalty appeal, the same can be resolved on payment of 25% provided the tax and all interest due have been paid.

(v) Immunity from prosecution on the disputed tax would be available

3. The Scheme, thus, provides a time bound process to resolve pending litigation without any uncertainty of the amount payable, which has been kept at that minimum. You may like to approach your Commissioner of Income Tax/Commissioner of Income Tax and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) to discuss the benefits of the scheme as applicable in your case.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

1 week ago