Income Tax

DRS Scheme 2016-Commissioner Appeal to familiarize assesseee with provisions for cases under appeal before CIT(A) as per CBDT direction

DRS Scheme 2016-Commissioner Appeal to familiarize assesseee with provisions for cases under appeal before CIT(A) as per CBDT direction.

F No. 279/Misc/M-61/2016
Government of India
Ministry  of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, Dated: 26th September, 2016

To,
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax

Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (IT&TP)
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)

Madam/Sir ,

Subject: Implementation of the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme,2016- Reg.

As a measure to improve the awareness of the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016 among the appellants who are most likely to take the advantage of Scheme, it has been decided to focus attention on appellants whose cases are under hearing before the Commissioner (Appeal).

2. In view of the same it has been decided that CIT (A) under your jurisdiction may be directed to append the “Flyer” without signature as per Annexure enclosed while sending the notice for hearing to the assessee to familiarize him with this Scheme.

This issues with the approval of Member (A&J) CBDT.

Yours faithfully

D.S. Rathi
DCIT(OSD)(ITJ)
CBDT

Annexure

Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016

The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016, The (Scheme) was introduced with effect from 01.06.2016. The primary aim is to reduce tax payer grievance and uncertainly caused due to long pending litigation before the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals). Whereas, litigation before CIT (A) is disputed chronologically and is dependent on tax effect, the Scheme provides an outer limit of 120 days for resolution of the pending matters. Practically, this period would be much shorter.

2. The Scheme provides for further relief in the following ways:

(i) Tax payable would include tax & interest till the date of assessment. Interest accrued  thereafter would not form part of tax payable.

(ii) If and disputed tax is below 10 lakhs. penalty would stand waived on payment of tax & interest.

(iii) Where the disputed tax is more than 10 lakhs, penalty of 75% would stand waived on payment of tax, interest and 25% of penalty levied/leviable.

(iv) In the case of a penalty appeal, the same can be resolved on payment of 25% provided the tax and all interest due have been paid.

(v) Immunity from prosecution on the disputed tax would be available

3. The Scheme, thus, provides a time bound process to resolve pending litigation without any uncertainty of the amount payable, which has been kept at that minimum. You may like to approach your Commissioner of Income Tax/Commissioner of Income Tax and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) to discuss the benefits of the scheme as applicable in your case.

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

8 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low & incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low and incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants As per the announcement made…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming FTC only directory not mandatory – ITAT

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory - ITAT In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Limitation to invoke power u/s 263 for issues not covered in re-assessment start from original assessment – ITAT

Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

1 week ago