Income Tax

e-Return Intermediary-Company Secretaries and Cost Accountants also qualified along with Chartered Accountants

e-Return Intermediary-Company Secretaries and Cost Accountants also qualified along with Chartered Accountants

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Department of Revenue

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 9th August, 2016

S.O. 2670(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1B) of section 139 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), issued vide S.O. 1281(E) dated the 27th July, 2007, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated the 27th July, 2007, namely:-

2. In the said notification, in para 5, in clause (1), for sub-clauses (c) and (d), the following sub-clauses shall be substituted, namely:-

“(c) a firm of Chartered Accountants or Company Secretaries or Cost Accountants or Advocates, if the firm has been allotted a permanent account number; or

(d) a Chartered Accountant or Company Secretary or Cost Accountant or Advocate or Tax Return Preparer, if he has been allotted a permanent account number; or”.

[Notification No. 66/2016/F. No.133/89/2015-TPL]

Dr. T. S. MAPWAL,

Under Secy.

Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 1281(E) dated the 27th July, 2007 and was last amended vide notification number S.O. 2413(E) dated 22.09.2009.  

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago