Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Income Tax Department has issued an advisory for a common taxpayers regarding effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on your TDS Credits. The advisory is as under:

Important for Deductees:  Why Timely TDS/TCS Corrections Mater

What Changed?

  • The sec on 397(3)(f) of Income Tax Act 2025 has reduced the me limit for deductors (employers, companies, vendors) to correct errors in TDS/TCS statements to 2 years.
  • If the deductor does not correct mistakes within this shorter window, the errors may remain permanently uncorrected.

What It Means for You ?

If your deductor fails to file correction statements in me:

❌ No Tax Credit in Form 26AS/AIS 

The tax deducted from your salary, professional fees, or vendor payment may not reflect correctly in your income tax records.

❌ Mismatch in Income Tax Return (ITR) 

During filing, you may see higher tax demand because the deducted tax is not credited to you.

❌ Delayed or Lost Refunds

Refund claims may be delayed, reduced, or even rejected if TDS data is missing or incorrect.

❌ Unnecessary Notices or Scrutiny

You may get income tax no ces asking for clarification or payment, even though tax was deducted from you.

❌ Stress & Financial Inconvenience

You may need to follow up with your employer/vendor and spend me resolving disputes.

How to Safeguard Yourself?

✅ Check your Form 26AS and AIS regularly to ensure all TDS/TCS is correctly reflected.

✅ Inform your deductor immediately if you notice errors.

✅ Keep proof of TDS deduc on (salary slip, invoice, challan, etc.).

✅ File grievances early through TRACES/Income Tax portal if the issue is not resolved.

  • Your tax credit depends on your deductor’s timely compliance.
  • Delays by deductors can directly impact your refunds, tax liability, and peace of mind.
  • Stay proactive: monitor your tax statements and raise issues quickly.

ABCAUS Note: What the Income Tax Department has chosen not to mention that the responsibility for ensuring that defaulters are penalised or prosecuted squarely rests with the Department itself. Significantly, these are not the case where the deductors  fails to deposit TDS; rather, the Department is seeking to shift the burden onto taxpayers who have absolutely no control over the actions of deductors. If the Department is genuinely serious about addressing this issue, it ought to establish a wholly dedicated, separate, transparent, and user-friendly mechanism for lodging complaints, along with a system that ensures their prompt and effective resolution.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

22 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago