Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Income Tax Department has issued an advisory for a common taxpayers regarding effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on your TDS Credits. The advisory is as under:

Important for Deductees:  Why Timely TDS/TCS Corrections Mater

What Changed?

  • The sec on 397(3)(f) of Income Tax Act 2025 has reduced the me limit for deductors (employers, companies, vendors) to correct errors in TDS/TCS statements to 2 years.
  • If the deductor does not correct mistakes within this shorter window, the errors may remain permanently uncorrected.

What It Means for You ?

If your deductor fails to file correction statements in me:

❌ No Tax Credit in Form 26AS/AIS 

The tax deducted from your salary, professional fees, or vendor payment may not reflect correctly in your income tax records.

❌ Mismatch in Income Tax Return (ITR) 

During filing, you may see higher tax demand because the deducted tax is not credited to you.

❌ Delayed or Lost Refunds

Refund claims may be delayed, reduced, or even rejected if TDS data is missing or incorrect.

❌ Unnecessary Notices or Scrutiny

You may get income tax no ces asking for clarification or payment, even though tax was deducted from you.

❌ Stress & Financial Inconvenience

You may need to follow up with your employer/vendor and spend me resolving disputes.

How to Safeguard Yourself?

✅ Check your Form 26AS and AIS regularly to ensure all TDS/TCS is correctly reflected.

✅ Inform your deductor immediately if you notice errors.

✅ Keep proof of TDS deduc on (salary slip, invoice, challan, etc.).

✅ File grievances early through TRACES/Income Tax portal if the issue is not resolved.

  • Your tax credit depends on your deductor’s timely compliance.
  • Delays by deductors can directly impact your refunds, tax liability, and peace of mind.
  • Stay proactive: monitor your tax statements and raise issues quickly.

ABCAUS Note: What the Income Tax Department has chosen not to mention that the responsibility for ensuring that defaulters are penalised or prosecuted squarely rests with the Department itself. Significantly, these are not the case where the deductors  fails to deposit TDS; rather, the Department is seeking to shift the burden onto taxpayers who have absolutely no control over the actions of deductors. If the Department is genuinely serious about addressing this issue, it ought to establish a wholly dedicated, separate, transparent, and user-friendly mechanism for lodging complaints, along with a system that ensures their prompt and effective resolution.

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

8 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low & incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low and incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants As per the announcement made…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming FTC only directory not mandatory – ITAT

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory - ITAT In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Limitation to invoke power u/s 263 for issues not covered in re-assessment start from original assessment – ITAT

Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

1 week ago