Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Income Tax Department has issued an advisory for a common taxpayers regarding effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on your TDS Credits. The advisory is as under:

Important for Deductees:  Why Timely TDS/TCS Corrections Mater

What Changed?

  • The sec on 397(3)(f) of Income Tax Act 2025 has reduced the me limit for deductors (employers, companies, vendors) to correct errors in TDS/TCS statements to 2 years.
  • If the deductor does not correct mistakes within this shorter window, the errors may remain permanently uncorrected.

What It Means for You ?

If your deductor fails to file correction statements in me:

❌ No Tax Credit in Form 26AS/AIS 

The tax deducted from your salary, professional fees, or vendor payment may not reflect correctly in your income tax records.

❌ Mismatch in Income Tax Return (ITR) 

During filing, you may see higher tax demand because the deducted tax is not credited to you.

❌ Delayed or Lost Refunds

Refund claims may be delayed, reduced, or even rejected if TDS data is missing or incorrect.

❌ Unnecessary Notices or Scrutiny

You may get income tax no ces asking for clarification or payment, even though tax was deducted from you.

❌ Stress & Financial Inconvenience

You may need to follow up with your employer/vendor and spend me resolving disputes.

How to Safeguard Yourself?

✅ Check your Form 26AS and AIS regularly to ensure all TDS/TCS is correctly reflected.

✅ Inform your deductor immediately if you notice errors.

✅ Keep proof of TDS deduc on (salary slip, invoice, challan, etc.).

✅ File grievances early through TRACES/Income Tax portal if the issue is not resolved.

  • Your tax credit depends on your deductor’s timely compliance.
  • Delays by deductors can directly impact your refunds, tax liability, and peace of mind.
  • Stay proactive: monitor your tax statements and raise issues quickly.

ABCAUS Note: What the Income Tax Department has chosen not to mention that the responsibility for ensuring that defaulters are penalised or prosecuted squarely rests with the Department itself. Significantly, these are not the case where the deductors  fails to deposit TDS; rather, the Department is seeking to shift the burden onto taxpayers who have absolutely no control over the actions of deductors. If the Department is genuinely serious about addressing this issue, it ought to establish a wholly dedicated, separate, transparent, and user-friendly mechanism for lodging complaints, along with a system that ensures their prompt and effective resolution.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

13 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

3 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago