Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits
Income Tax Department has issued an advisory for a common taxpayers regarding effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on your TDS Credits. The advisory is as under:
Important for Deductees: Why Timely TDS/TCS Corrections Mater
What Changed?
What It Means for You ?
If your deductor fails to file correction statements in me:
❌ No Tax Credit in Form 26AS/AIS
The tax deducted from your salary, professional fees, or vendor payment may not reflect correctly in your income tax records.
❌ Mismatch in Income Tax Return (ITR)
During filing, you may see higher tax demand because the deducted tax is not credited to you.
❌ Delayed or Lost Refunds
Refund claims may be delayed, reduced, or even rejected if TDS data is missing or incorrect.
❌ Unnecessary Notices or Scrutiny
You may get income tax no ces asking for clarification or payment, even though tax was deducted from you.
❌ Stress & Financial Inconvenience
You may need to follow up with your employer/vendor and spend me resolving disputes.
How to Safeguard Yourself?
✅ Check your Form 26AS and AIS regularly to ensure all TDS/TCS is correctly reflected.
✅ Inform your deductor immediately if you notice errors.
✅ Keep proof of TDS deduc on (salary slip, invoice, challan, etc.).
✅ File grievances early through TRACES/Income Tax portal if the issue is not resolved.
ABCAUS Note: What the Income Tax Department has chosen not to mention that the responsibility for ensuring that defaulters are penalised or prosecuted squarely rests with the Department itself. Significantly, these are not the case where the deductors fails to deposit TDS; rather, the Department is seeking to shift the burden onto taxpayers who have absolutely no control over the actions of deductors. If the Department is genuinely serious about addressing this issue, it ought to establish a wholly dedicated, separate, transparent, and user-friendly mechanism for lodging complaints, along with a system that ensures their prompt and effective resolution.
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…
Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…
Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…
No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…
Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…