Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Income Tax Department has issued an advisory for a common taxpayers regarding effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on your TDS Credits. The advisory is as under:

Important for Deductees:  Why Timely TDS/TCS Corrections Mater

What Changed?

  • The sec on 397(3)(f) of Income Tax Act 2025 has reduced the me limit for deductors (employers, companies, vendors) to correct errors in TDS/TCS statements to 2 years.
  • If the deductor does not correct mistakes within this shorter window, the errors may remain permanently uncorrected.

What It Means for You ?

If your deductor fails to file correction statements in me:

❌ No Tax Credit in Form 26AS/AIS 

The tax deducted from your salary, professional fees, or vendor payment may not reflect correctly in your income tax records.

❌ Mismatch in Income Tax Return (ITR) 

During filing, you may see higher tax demand because the deducted tax is not credited to you.

❌ Delayed or Lost Refunds

Refund claims may be delayed, reduced, or even rejected if TDS data is missing or incorrect.

❌ Unnecessary Notices or Scrutiny

You may get income tax no ces asking for clarification or payment, even though tax was deducted from you.

❌ Stress & Financial Inconvenience

You may need to follow up with your employer/vendor and spend me resolving disputes.

How to Safeguard Yourself?

✅ Check your Form 26AS and AIS regularly to ensure all TDS/TCS is correctly reflected.

✅ Inform your deductor immediately if you notice errors.

✅ Keep proof of TDS deduc on (salary slip, invoice, challan, etc.).

✅ File grievances early through TRACES/Income Tax portal if the issue is not resolved.

  • Your tax credit depends on your deductor’s timely compliance.
  • Delays by deductors can directly impact your refunds, tax liability, and peace of mind.
  • Stay proactive: monitor your tax statements and raise issues quickly.

ABCAUS Note: What the Income Tax Department has chosen not to mention that the responsibility for ensuring that defaulters are penalised or prosecuted squarely rests with the Department itself. Significantly, these are not the case where the deductors  fails to deposit TDS; rather, the Department is seeking to shift the burden onto taxpayers who have absolutely no control over the actions of deductors. If the Department is genuinely serious about addressing this issue, it ought to establish a wholly dedicated, separate, transparent, and user-friendly mechanism for lodging complaints, along with a system that ensures their prompt and effective resolution.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

FDCM invites application for empanelment of practising CAs/ Chartered Accountant Firms

Invitation For Empanelment Of Practising Chartered Accountants / Chartered Accountant Firms Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM Limited), Nagpur,…

3 days ago
  • Empanelment

PGRI invites application for CAs for empanelment for Circulation Verification work

Press Registrar General of India (PGRI) invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountants. The Press Registrar General of India manages…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies revised Form for registration as valuer & authorised income tax practitioner

CBDT notifies revised Form No. 169 for making application for registration as a valuer under section 514 and authorised income…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from 30 days prejudiced assessee’s right – HC

Curtailing time to file reply to notice u/s 148A(b) from statutorily available 30 days to 15 days seriously prejudiced assessee’s…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AB, applicability of proviso to section 2(15) can’t be adjudicated

At the stage of registration u/s 12AB, the CIT(E) not empowered to adjudicate applicability of provisio to section 2(15) of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Flower bed area not included in “built up area” to calculate eligible limit u/s 80IB(10)

Flower bed area could not be included in the definition of “built up area” to calculate eligible limit of 1000…

6 days ago