Income Tax

Exclusions from both export and total turnover for deduction u/s 10A – CBDT Circular 4/2018

Exclusions from both export and total turnover for deduction u/s 10A – CBDT Circular 4/2018. All charges/expenses in Explanation 2(iv) liable to be excluded

Circular No. 4/2018

F. No. 279/Misc./140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, 14th August 2018

Subject: Computation of admissible deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 -Regarding

As per the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), the profits derived from export of articles or things or computer software shall be the amount which bears to the profits of the business of the undertaking , the same proportion as the export turnover in respect of such articles or things or computer software bears to the total turnover of the business carried on by the undertaking.

2. Further as per clause (iv) to Explanation 2 to section 10A of the Act, “export turnover” means the consideration in respect of export by the undertaking of articles or things or computer software received in, or brought into, India by the assessee in convertible foreign exchange in accordance with sub-section (3), but does not include freight, telecommunication charges or insurance attributable  abcaus.in to the delivery of the articles or things or computer software outside India or expenses, if any, incurred in foreign exchange  in providing the technical  services outside India.

3. The issue whether freight, telecommunication charges and insurance expenses are to be excluded from both ”export turnover ” and ‘”total turnover” while working out deduction admissible under section 10A of the Act on the ground that they are attributable to delivery of articles or things or computer software outside India has been highly contentious. Similarly, the issue whether charges for providing  technical services outside India are to be excluded both from ‘”export turnover” and “total turnover ” while computing deduction admissible under section 10A of the Act on the ground that  such charges are relatable towards expenses incurred in convertible foreign  exchange in providing technical  services outside  India has also been  highly  contentious.

4. The controversy has been finally settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgement dated 24.4.2018 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-Ill Vs. M/s HCL Technologies Ltd. (CA No. 8489-8490 of 2013, NJRS Citation 2018-LL-0424-40). While deciding the issue the Apex Court has held as under:

‘”17) The similar nature of controversy, akin to this case,  arose before the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd (2012) 20./ Taxman 321/17. The issue before the Karnataka High Court was whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that while computing relief under Section 10A of the IT Act, the amount of communication expenses should be excluded from the total turnover if the same are reduced from  the export turnover? While giving the answer to the issue, the High Court, inter-alia, held that when a particular word is not defined by the legislature abcaus.in and an ordinary meaning is to be attributed to it, the said ordinary meaning is to be in conformity with the context in which it is used. Hence, what is excluded from ‘export turnover’ must also be excluded from ‘total turnover’, since one of the components of ‘total turnover’ is export turnover. Any other interpretation would run counter to the legislative intent and would be impermissible.

18) Accordingly, the formula for computation of the deduction under Section 10A of the Act would be as follows:

19) In the instant case. if the deductions on freight, telecommunication and insurance attributable to the delivery of computer software under Section 10A of the IT Act are allowed only in Export Turnover but not from the Total Turnover then, it would give rise to inadvertent. unlawful, meaningless and illogical result which would cause grave injustice to the Respondent which could have never been the intention of the legislature.

20) Even in common parlance, when the object of the formula is to arrive at the profit from export business, expenses excluded from export turnover have to be excluded from total turnover Otherwise, any other interpretation makes the formula unworkable and absurd. Hence, we are satisfied that such deduction shall be allowed from the total turnover in same proportion as well.

21) On the issue of expenses on technical services provided outside. we have to follow the same principle of interpretation as followed in the case of expenses of freight, telecommunication etc., otherwise the formula of calculation would be futile. Hence , in the same way, expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing the technical services outside shall be allowed to exclude from the total turnover.”

5. The issue has been examined by the Board and it is clarified that freight, telecommunication charges and insurance expenses are to be excluded both from ‘export turnover’ and “total turnover ”, while working out deduction admissible under section 10A of the Act to the extent they are attributable to the delivery of articles or things or computer software outside India.

6. Similarly, expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing the technical services outside India are to be excluded from both ”export turnover” and ”total turnover’ while computing deduction admissible under section 10Aof the Act.

Thus, all charges/expenses specified in Explanation 2(iv) to section 10A of the Act, are liable to be excluded from total turnover also for the purpose of computation of deduction u/s 10A of the Act.

7. Accordingly, henceforth, appeals may not be filed by the Department on the above settled issue, and those already filed may be withdrawn / not pressed  upon.

8. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

9. Hindi version of the same will follow.

(Neetika Bansal)
Director (ITJ)
CBDT, New Delhi

Copy to:

  1. The Chairperson , Members and officers of the CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above.
  2. OSD to Revenue Secretary.
  3. All Chief Commissioners of Income-Tax & All Directors General of Income-Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers.
  4. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India
  5. The Director General of Income-Tax, NADT, Nagpur.
  6. The DGIT (Systems), ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extension , New Delhi.
  7. The DGIT (Vigilance), New Delhi.
  8. The ADG (PR. PP & OL) for circulation as per usual mailing list
  9. The ADG-4 (Systems) for uploading on Income Tax Department website
  10. Database Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.gov.in
  11. njrs_support@nsdl.co.in   for uploading  on  NJRS.
  12. Hindi section for Hindi translation of the Circular.
  13. Guard File

Download CBDT Circular No. 4 / 2018 Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

9 hours ago
  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago