Income Tax

Exemption from deeming provisions of section 56(2)(x). More exclusions under Rule 11UAC

Exemption from deeming provisions of section 56(2)(x). Rule 11UAC amended to include more exclusions apart from unauthorised colony in NCT of Delhi

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
 
NOTIFICATION
 
New Delhi, the 29th June, 2020
 
G.S.R. 421(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (XI) of the proviso to clause (x) of sub-section (2) of section 56 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules,1962, namely:─
 
1.Short title and commencement.‒ (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (14th Amendment) Rules, 2020.
 
(2) They shall come into force from the 1st day of April, 2020 and shall be applicable for assessment year 2020-21 and subsequent assessment years.
 
2.In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, for rule 11UAC, the following rule shall be substituted, namely:—

Prescribed class of persons for the purpose of clause (XI) of the proviso to clause (x) of sub-section (2) of section 56.

11UAC. The provisions of clause (x) of sub-section (2) of section 56 shall not apply to,-
 
(1) any immovable property, being land or building or both, received by a resident of an unauthorised colony in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, where the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazettee, regularised the transactions of such immovable property based on the latest Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sale, Will, possession letter and other documents including documents evidencing payment of consideration for conferring or recognising right of ownership or transfer or mortgage in regard to such immovable property in favour of such resident.
 
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-rule,-
 
(a) “resident” means a person having physical possession of property on the basis of a registered sale deed or latest set of Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sale, Will, possession letter and other documents including documents evidencing payment of consideration in respect of a property in unauthorised colonies and includes their legal heirs but does not include tenant, licensee or permissive user;
 
(b) “unauthorised colony” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (b) of section 2 of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (Recognition of Property Rights of Residents in Unauthorised Colonies) Act, 2019 (45 of 2019).
 
(2) any movable property, being unquoted shares, of a company and its subsidiary and the subsidiary of such subsidiary received by a shareholder, where,—
 
(i) the Tribunal, on an application moved by the Central Government under section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, has suspended the Board of Directors of such company and has appointed new directors nominated by the Central Government under section 242 of the said Act; and
 
(ii) share of company and its subsidiary and the subsidiary of such subsidiary has been received pursuant to a resolution plan approved by the Tribunal under section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.
 
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-rule,-
 
(a) a company shall be a subsidiary of another company, if such other company holds more than half in nominal value of the equity share capital of the company;
 
(b) “Tribunal” shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (90) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013).
 
(3) any movable property, being equity shares, of the reconstructed bank, received by the investor or the investor bank, as the case may be, where the said share has been allotted by the reconstructed bank under the scheme at a price specified in sub-paragraph (3) of paragraph 3 of the scheme.
 
Explanation. —For the purposes of this sub-rule,-
 
(a) “investor” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in sub-clause (b) of clause (1) of paragraph 2 of the Scheme;
 
(b) “investor bank ” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in sub-clause (c) of clause (1) of paragraph 2 of the Scheme;
 
(c) “reconstructed bank” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in sub-clause (d) of clause (1) of paragraph 2 of the Scheme;
 
(d) “Scheme” means Yes Bank Limited Reconstruction Scheme, 2020.
 
[F. No.370149/143/2019-TPL]
 
ANKIT JAIN, Under Secy.
(Tax Policy and Legislation)
 
Explanatory Memorandum:It is hereby certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to these rules.
 
Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii) vide number S.O. 969 (E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and last amended vide notification number G.S.R No. 415 (E) dated 26th June , 2020.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

22 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago