Income Tax

Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services. Allowability-actual or as per accounting method

Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services. Allowability of upfront fee paid or deferred on actual payment basis or as per accounting method employed.

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT  OF REVENUE)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 89/2016

New Delhi, the 4th October, 2016

INCOME -TAX

S.O. 3145(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (iii) of Explanation to section 35ABA and section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby, makes the following rules further to amend the Income- tax Rules, 1962, namely:-

(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (24th Amendment) Rules, 2016.

(2) They shall come into force on the ate of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax  Rules, 1962, after rule  6, the  following rule  shall  be inserted, namely:-

‘6A.Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services.- (1) For the purpose of section 35ABA, the term “payment has actually been made” shall mean,-

(a) where an assessee has opted and been allowed by the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India to make full upfront payment of spectrum fee, the actual payment of expenditure irrespective of the previous year in which the liability for the expenditure was incurred according to the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee;

(b) where an assessee has opted and been allowed by the Department of Telecommunications, Government   of   India to make deferred payment, the amount which would have been payable by the assessee had he opted for full upfront payment of spectrum fee irrespective of the previous year in which the liability for the expenditure was incurred according to the method  of accounting regularly employed by the assessee.

2. In case of deferred payment referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1), where there is failure by the assessee to comply with an y of the conditions specified by the scheme of the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India and Department of Telecommunications terminates the allotment or assignment of spectrum, the Assessing officer shall, in exercise of power vested in him under sub-section (3) of section 35ABA shall re-compute the total income of the assessee for the previous year in which the deduction has been claimed and granted to him by deeming that,-

(i) the total amount of spectrum fee paid up to the date of termination is the amount of “payment actually been made”;

(ii) the spectrum was in force up to the date of its termination for the purpose of computing “relevant previous year”;’.

[Notification No. 89 /2016, F.No.370142/14/2016 -TPL]

(PITAMBAR DAS)
DIRECTOR (TAX POLICY AND LEGISLATION)

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order rejecting stay of income tax demand should recite merits if it is a case for stay or not

In an order rejecting stay of income tax demand there should be a recital of the merits whether it is…

5 days ago