Income Tax

Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services. Allowability-actual or as per accounting method

Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services. Allowability of upfront fee paid or deferred on actual payment basis or as per accounting method employed.

GOVERNMENT  OF INDIA
MINISTRY  OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT  OF REVENUE)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 89/2016

New Delhi, the 4th October, 2016

INCOME -TAX

S.O. 3145(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (iii) of Explanation to section 35ABA and section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby, makes the following rules further to amend the Income- tax Rules, 1962, namely:-

(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (24th Amendment) Rules, 2016.

(2) They shall come into force on the ate of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax  Rules, 1962, after rule  6, the  following rule  shall  be inserted, namely:-

6A.Expenditure for obtaining right to use spectrum for telecommunication services.- (1) For the purpose of section 35ABA, the term “payment has actually been made” shall mean,-

(a) where an assessee has opted and been allowed by the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India to make full upfront payment of spectrum fee, the actual payment of expenditure irrespective of the previous year in which the liability for the expenditure was incurred according to the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee;

(b) where an assessee has opted and been allowed by the Department of Telecommunications, Government   of   India to make deferred payment, the amount which would have been payable by the assessee had he opted for full upfront payment of spectrum fee irrespective of the previous year in which the liability for the expenditure was incurred according to the method  of accounting regularly employed by the assessee.

2. In case of deferred payment referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1), where there is failure by the assessee to comply with an y of the conditions specified by the scheme of the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India and Department of Telecommunications terminates the allotment or assignment of spectrum, the Assessing officer shall, in exercise of power vested in him under sub-section (3) of section 35ABA shall re-compute the total income of the assessee for the previous year in which the deduction has been claimed and granted to him by deeming that,-

(i) the total amount of spectrum fee paid up to the date of termination is the amount of “payment actually been made”;

(ii) the spectrum was in force up to the date of its termination for the purpose of computing “relevant previous year”;’.

[Notification No. 89 /2016, F.No.370142/14/2016 -TPL]

(PITAMBAR DAS)
DIRECTOR (TAX POLICY AND LEGISLATION)

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026

FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted penalty for making a wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B

Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…

3 days ago