Income Tax

Extension of due date for furnishing report u/s 286 (4) of Income-tax Act 1961 

Extension of the due date for furnishing of report u/s 286 (4) of the Income-tax Act 1961 by constituent entity.

Circular  No. 9/2018

F No 370142/17/2018 -TPL

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
****

New Delhi. Dated December 26, 2018

Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Vide Notification in GSR 1217 (E) dated December 18, 2018 with effect from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette, i.e., December 18, 2018; amendments to the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) have been carried out and sub-rule (4) of Rule 1ODB has been substituted; to provide that the period for furnishing of the report under sub-section (4) of section 286 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (the Act) by the constituent entity referred to in that sub-section shall be twelve months from the end of the reporting accounting year. 

1.1 It has been further provided that in case the parent entity of the constituent entity is resident of a country or territory, where,there has been a systemic failure of the country or territory and the said failure has been intimated to such constituent entity, the period for submission of the report shall be six months from the end of the month in which said systemic failure has been intimated. 

2. Representations from the stakeholders have been received by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (the Board) in the It has been, inter alia, stated that the constituent entity of an international group, which is resident in India, having parent entity resident in jurisdictions with which India does not have an agreement providing for exchange of the report of the nature referred to in sub-section (2) of the Act and where the reporting accounting year is calendar year based, i.e., ending on December 31 of the year, would need to furnish the report under sub-section (4) of section 286 of the Act in India by December 31, 2018. 

2.1     It has also been represented that read with the amendment  to section 286 of the Act and the substituted sub-rule (4) of rule 1ODB of the Rules, the constituent entity in such case for reporting accounting year ending on March 31, 2017 would have been required to furnish the CbCR by March 31. 2018 which is not plausible.

3. In order to remove the genuine hardship in furnishing of the report under sub-section (4) of section 286 of the Act read with sub-rule (4) of rule 10DB of the Rules caused as above, and as a one-time measure, the Board, in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Act , extend the period for furnishing of said report by the constituent entities referred to under clause (a) or (aa) of said sub-section , in respect of reporting accounting years ending upto February 28, 2018, to March 31.2019.

(Niraj Kumar)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Copy to:

  1. PS/ OSD to FM/ PS/OSD to MoS(F)
  2. PS to Revenue Secretary
  3. Chairman and Members, CBDT
  4. All Joint Secretaries/ CsiT, CBDT
  5. Directors/ Deputy Secretaries/ Under Secretaries of CBDT
  6. DIT (RSP&PR)/Systems, New Delhi
  7. The C&AG of India (30 copies)
  8. The JS & Legal Adviser , Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi
  9. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
  10. CIT (M&TP) , Official Spokesperson of CBDT
  11. 0/o DGIT (Systems) for uploading on official website

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago