Faceless Assessment order quashed as no password was sent in the link to join video conferencing for the hearing
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3563 (2021) (11) HC
In the instant case, the assessee had wiled a Writ Petition to challenge the faceless assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC).
The principal submission of the Petitioner assessee was that he did not receive the password in the link sent to him for joining the video conference on the last date of the hearing of the assessment. Being aggrieved, the assessee immediately sent an E-mail, within 20 minutes of the appointed time, voicing its grievance.
The case of the assessee was that the impugned assessment order had been passed in complete negation of the essential principle of natural justice without considering the said mail.
On query from the bench, the Department admitted that apparently the password had remained from being sent to the petitioner.
In view of the above, the Hon’ble High Court held that the petitioner was deprived of the opportunity of hearing owing to the technical error on part of the revenue authorities.
The Hon’ble High Court said that the opportunity of personal hearing in the context of the assessment order is a sine qua non. That opportunity had been denied.
The Hon’ble High Court held that the impugned order could not be sustained and it accordingly set aside it and remitted to the Income Tax Department to pass a fresh order.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…