Meaning of Genuineness of trust activities explained by ITAT

Meaning of genuineness of trust activities – they should not be bogus, artificial or camouflaged and whether in accordance with objects – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3323 (2020) (06) ITAT

Important case law relied upon by the parties:
Baburam Education Society (2018) 96 taxmann.com 606 

Meaning of Genuineness of trust activities 

The assessee filed application for registration under section 12AA and approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 

The assessee  claimed  to  have  worked  in  the  field  of  improving  the health and educational outcomes of the children, young  people including mothers through  programs like deworming, early childhood  care, diarrhea and pneumonia management  etc. 

The assessee carried research and provided technical assistance/ consultancy to various government department engaged in the field of health and malnutrition-related problems.

However, the  application for registration  under section 12AA  was  rejected  by  the  CIT (Exemption) mainly on the ground that no evidence of actual activities were submitted by the assessee and, therefore,  genuineness  of the activities of the assessee  could  not  be established. 

The assessee had initially filed application for registration under section 12AA of the act which had been dismissed. Referring to the earlier application, the CIT(

E) mentioned that there was no change in the circumstances. Consequently, the approval sought under section 80G was also rejected. 

The assessee trust filed an appeal before the Tribunal and submitted that the earlier registration application was withdrawn by the assessee itself and therefore its dismissal was not having any impact on the second application for registration. 

Further, it was submitted that in view of the decision of the  Hon’ble High Court for granting registration only the charitable  nature of object has to be seen. 

The Revenue submitted that the assessee had not filed any evidence of its association with Government of India or State Governments for carrying out or conducting its activities claimed in its objects.

It was also submitted that another organization which is a USA based organization, was registered on the same address as that of the assessee.

The Tribunal stated that for registration u/s 12AA of the Act, the assessee must fulfill the twin conditions. Firstly, the objects of the society/trust should be charitable in nature and secondly, the activities of the society/trust should be genuine.

The Tribunal noted the decision of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in which it was held that where the trust has not  commenced  the  charitable  activities,  in  such circumstances  the  only object of the trust should be seen for grant of registration  under section 12A of the act. 

The Tribunal further observed that in the instant case the  assessee  had already received donations for undertaking technical  assistant  to government of India for but no evidence of such activities were furnished before the CIT(E) and therefore the decision relied  upon  by the assessee was distinguishable.  

The Tribunal opined that the reference by the CIT(E) of earlier rejection of the registration was misplaced because said rejection or dismissal of registration was in view of the withdrawal of the application by the assessee and therefore there was no decision on merit either on the object or the genuineness of the activity of the assessee.

The Tribunal found that the CIT(E ) had not disputed the charitable nature of the activity of the assessee but the registration had been rejected  mainly  due  to  non-genuineness  of  the  activity  of  the assessee concluded on the basis of non-submission of  evidence by  the assessee. 

The Tribunal opined that it was imperative to examine the  genuineness  of  the activities of the assessee duly supported  with  the evidences. 

The Tribunal stated that the genuineness of the activities would  mean that the activities are not bogus or artificial or camouflaged  by some means and whether the activities are in accordance with the object of the institution. 

Accordingly, the Tribunal restored the matter of registration under section 12AA of the Act back to the CIT(E) for examining the genuineness of the activities.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

• Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT
• Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT
• Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT
• Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII
• Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(1)(a) to remand case can be exercised only in best judgment assessment