Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority notified for exemption u/s 10(46) from assessment years 2019-2020 to 2023-2024.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 22nd October, 2018
S.O. 5368(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority’, Gandhinagar, a body constituted by the Government of Gujarat, in respect of the following specified income arising to that body, namely:—
(a) Grants and loans received from the State Government;
(b) All fees received under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and the Gujarat Real Estate (Regulation and Development) (General) Rules, 2017;
(c) Sums realized by way of penalties under sub-section (2) of the section 76 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016; and
(d) Interest accrued on (a) to (c) above.
2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gandhinagar,—
(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;
(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and
(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.
[F.No. 300196/44/2018-ITA-I]
VINAY SHEEL GAUTAM, Under Secy
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…