Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority notified for exemption u/s 10(46) from assessment years 2019-2020 to 2023-2024.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 22nd October, 2018
S.O. 5368(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority’, Gandhinagar, a body constituted by the Government of Gujarat, in respect of the following specified income arising to that body, namely:—
(a) Grants and loans received from the State Government;
(b) All fees received under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and the Gujarat Real Estate (Regulation and Development) (General) Rules, 2017;
(c) Sums realized by way of penalties under sub-section (2) of the section 76 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016; and
(d) Interest accrued on (a) to (c) above.
2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gandhinagar,—
(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;
(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and
(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.
[F.No. 300196/44/2018-ITA-I]
VINAY SHEEL GAUTAM, Under Secy
----------- Similar Posts: -----------Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…