Income Tax

IDS 2016-Fair market value of immovable property evidenced by a registered deed to be adjusted by Cost Inflation Index. CBDT Notification 74/2016

IDS 2016-Fair market value of immovable property evidenced by a registered deed to be adjusted by Cost Inflation Index. 

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

New Delhi, the 17th August, 2016

Notification No. 74/2016

S.O._______- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and subsection (2) of section 199 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, makes the following rules further to amend the Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules) namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income Declaration Scheme (Third Amendment) Rules, 2016.
    (2) These rules shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the principal rules, in rule 3, in sub-rule (1), in clause (d), after sub-clause (II) following shall be inserted, namely:-

‘Provided that where the acquisition of immovable property by the declarant is evidenced by a deed registered with any authority of a State Government, the fair market value of such property shall, at the option of the declarant, may be taken on the stamp duty value as increased by the same proportion as Cost Inflation Index for the year 2016-17 bears to the Cost Inflation Index for the year in which the property was registered:

Provided further that where the immovable property was acquired before the 1st day of April, 1981, the provisions of the first proviso shall have effect as if for the words “stamp duty value”, the words “the fair market value of the property as on 1st day of April, 1981 on the basis of the valuation report obtained by the declarant from a registered valuer”, and for the words “Cost Inflation Index for the year in which the property was registered”, the words “Cost Inflation Index for the year 1981-82” had been substituted.

Explanation- For the purposes of this clause,-

(i) “stamp duty value” means the value adopted or assessed by any authority of the State Government for the purposes of payment of stamp duty in respect of an immovable property;
(ii) “Cost Inflation Index” means such index as notified under clause (v) of Explanation to section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.’.

3. In the principal rules, in Annexure to Form-1,-

(A) in serial number III, for item number 1, the following item shall be substituted, namely:-

“1. Immovable property (attach valuation report)
(i) Nature of property (land/building/flat etc.) ________________
(ii) Address of the property ________________
(iii) Name(s) under which held ________________
(iv) Date of acquisition ________________
(v) Cost of acquisition as per rule 3(1)(d)(I) ________________
(vi) Value as estimated by the registered valuer ________________
       on 1st June, 2016 as per rule 3(1)(d)(II)
(vii) Value as per proviso to Rule 3(1)(d)

Identification number and date of the registered deed Value adopted for stamp duty, if property is acquired on or after 01.04.1981 Fair market value as on 01.04.1981, if property acquired before 01.04.1981 Indexed value of the property as on 01.06.2016

(viii) Fair market value as per rule 3 ________________”;

(B) after serial number IV, the following shall be inserted, namely:-

“V. Whether any part of income referred in (I) is in the form of fictitious liability  YES/NO
VI. If reply to (V) is Yes, whether such liability is directly linked to any asset disclosed in the balance sheet YES/NO
VII. If reply to (VI) is No, furnish the following:
1. Nature of liability _____________
2. Financial year in which the liability was created _____________
3. Amount of liability ___________”

(F.No.142/8/2016-TPL)

(Dr. T.S. Mapwal)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance quashed as CIT (A) has power of enhancements – ITAT

ITAT quashed order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance observing in appellate proceedings, CIT(A) has power of enhancements of income assessed, if…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless evading tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless AO finds that one of them is trying…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

‘Transfer of property’ not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property – ITAT

The word ‘transfer of property’ does not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property and only can be confined…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was not justified in questioning cash withdrawals from bank account – ITAT

AO is not justified in questioning the cash withdrawals from bank account on the ground that the assessee had sufficient…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Return/Balance sheet filed within limitation extended by SC to be considered within time

Return/Balance sheet to be considered as being within time if filed within timeline condoned by Hon'ble Supreme Court due to…

3 days ago