Income Tax

Income Declaration Scheme 2016 Jurisdictional Commissioner Pr CIT. Declaration to be made to CITexercising jurisdiction over the declarant u/s 120

Income Declaration Scheme 2016 Jurisdictional Commissioner Pr CIT. Declaration to be made to CIT exercising jurisdiction over the declarant u/s 120 

Circular No.19/2016

F.No I87/10/2016.ITA.I
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(Income-Tax)

New Delhi, the 25th May,2016

Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, introduced vide Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), provides an opportunity to persons who have not paid full taxes in the past to come forward and declare their undisclosed income. Rule 4 of the Income Declaration Scheme Rules, 2016 provides that a declaration of income or income in the form of investment in any asset u/s 183 shall be made in the prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner who exercises jurisdiction over the declarant.

2. It is, therefore, clarified that the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner, as the case may be, who exercises jurisdiction u/s 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as notified by CBDT from time to time over such declarant, shall be the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner as referred to in section 186 of the Income Declaration Scheme 2016 to whom declaration under 183 of that Scheme is to be made.

Note: Notifications of the Government of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, pertaining to the jurisdiction u/ s 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II Section 3, Sub-section (ii)- S.O. 2752 (E ) dated 22.10.2014, S.O. 2754 (E) dated 22.10.2014, S.O. 2814 (E) dated 03.11.2014, S.O. 2885 (E) dated 12.11.2014, S.O. 3244 (E) dated 19.12.2014, S.O. 2911 (E) dated 13.11.2014, S.O. 2922 (E) dated 15.11.2014, S.O. 2915 (E) dated 13.11.2014, S.O. 3911 (E) dated 16.12.2014, S.O. 355 (E) dated 05.02.2015, S.O. 2812 (E) dated 13.10.2015. ‘

DEEPSHIKHA SHARMA
Director to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

When foundation of reopening does not survive, no addition can be made for other issues

When foundation of reopening does not survive, no addition can be made in respect of other issues - ITAT In…

6 hours ago
  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

1 day ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

3 days ago